As inspeções/avaliações externas de escolas

efeitos nas instituições escolares descritos em artigos publicados desde 2016

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25053/redufor.v7i1.7068

Palavras-chave:

Eficácia Educacional, Avaliação Externa de Escolas, Inspeção Escolar, Efeitos

Resumo

Este artigo tem por objetivo realizar uma revisão sistemática sobre os efeitos das inspeções escolares/avaliações externas de escola nas escolas, apresentados nos resultados divulgados por artigos de acesso aberto, publicados em revistas científicas, presentes nas bases de dados Web of Science e Scopus, desde 2016 até o momento (14/08/2021). Foram efetuadas pesquisas por palavras-chave, realizadas leituras dos títulos, resumos, palavras-chave e textos integrais e utilizado software de apoio. De 914 artigos iniciais, consideraram-se relevantes 14 artigos. As evidências de ocorrência de efeitos não desejados, são aquelas que estão mais presentes. A realização de estudos longitudinais, envolvendo várias escolas, com utilização de grupos de controlo, aumentará o conhecimento da ocorrência dos efeitos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Pascoal Diogo Albuquerque, Universidade de Coimbra

Doutorando em Ciências da Educação - Especialidade em Organização do Ensino, Aprendizagem e Formação de Professores, da Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra, colaborador estrangeiro do Grupo de Pesquisa em História da Educação e Controles da Universidade Federal da Paraíba.

António Gomes Ferreira, Universidade de Coimbra

Professor de Ciências da Educação na FPCE da Universidade de Coimbra e Diretor da mesma instituição, responsável pelos Serviços de Qualidade Pedagógica, perito em avaliação externa na Agência de Avaliação do Ensino Superior.

Carlos Manuel Folgado Barreira, Universidade de Coimbra

Professor Auxiliar na Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra. Desenvolve atividade de investigação e ensino nos cursos de licenciatura, mestrado e doutoramento, essencialmente no domínio da avaliação educacional. Tem participado, como perito, no programa de Avaliação Externa de Escolas.

Referências

BROWN, M. et al. Polycentric inspection: a catalyst for sparking positive interactions in educational networks. Evaluation, [S.l.], v. 26, n. 1, p. 76-97, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019895031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019895031

DIJKSTRA, A. et al. Inspecting school social quality: assessing and improving school effectiveness in the social domain. Journal of Social Science Education, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 4, p. 75-84, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/jsse-v16-i4-1640.

EHREN, M. Introducing school inspections. In: EHREN, M. (ed.). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, accountability and educational improvement. Switzerland: Springer International, 2016a. p. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_1

EHREN, M. School inspections and school improvement; the current evidence base. In: EHREN, M. (ed.). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, accountability and educational improvement. Switzerland: Springer International, 2016b. p. 69-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_4

EHREN, M.; JONES, K.; PERRYMAN, J. Side effects of school inspection; motivations and contexts for strategic responses. In: EHREN, M. (ed.). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, accountability and educational improvement. Switzerland: Springer International, 2016. p. 87-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_5

EHREN, M.; PIETSCH, M. Validation of inspection frameworks and methods. In: EHREN, M. (ed.). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, accountability and educational improvement. Switzerland: Springer International, 2016. p. 47-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_3

*EHREN, M.; SHACKLETON, N. Mechanisms of change in Dutch inspected schools: comparing schools in different inspection treatments. British Journal of Educational Studies, v. 64, n. 2, p. 185-213, 2016a. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1019413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1019413

*EHREN, M.; SHACKLETON, N. Risk-based school inspections: impact of targeted inspection approaches on Dutch secondary schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, v. 28, n. 4, p. 299-321, 2016b. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9242-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9242-0

HOFER, S.; HOLZBERGER, D.; REISS, K. Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: a systematic research synthesis on 30 years of international research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, [S.l.], v. 65, p. 1-19, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100864

HOPKINS, D.; REYNOLDS, D. The past, present and future of school improvement: towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 4, p. 459-475, 2001. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071461

*HOPKINS, E. et al. Teachers’ views of the impact of school evaluation and external inspection processes. Improving Schools, [S.l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 52-61, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480215627894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480215627894

*HULT, A.; EDSTRÖM, C. Teacher ambivalence towards school evaluation: promoting and ruining teacher professionalism. Education Inquiry, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 305-325, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30200

*JONES, K. et al. The unintended consequences of school inspection: the prevalence of inspection side-effects in Austria, the Czech Republic, England, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. Oxford Review of Education, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 6, p. 805-822, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1352499

*KEMETHOFER, D.; GUSTAFSSON, J.-E.; ALTRICHTER, H. Comparing effects of school inspections in Sweden and Austria. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, [S.l.], v. 29, p. 319-337, 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9265-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9265-1

MAIA, I.; PACHECO, J. Gestão curricular baseada em resultados e standards e seus efeitos na avaliação institucional. Laplage em Revista, Sorocaba, v. 5, n. esp., p. 18-30, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020195especial775p.18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020195especial775p.18-30

MORTIMORE, P. et al. School matters: the junior years. Wells: Open Books, 1988.

*MOURAZ, A.; LEITE, C.; FERNANDES, P. Between external influence and autonomy of schools: effects of external evaluation of schools. Paidéia, Ribeirão Preto, v. 29, p. 1-11, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e2922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e2922

PACHECO, J. Avaliação externa de escolas. Um projeto de investigação. In: PACHECO, J. (org.). Avaliação externa de escolas: quadro teórico/conceptual. Porto: Porto, 2014. p. 7-13.

PACHECO, J. Resultados globais do projeto. In: BARREIRA, C.; BIDARRA, M. G.; VAZ-REBELO, M. P. (org.). Estudos sobre avaliação externa de escolas. Porto: Porto, 2016. p. 263-271.

PENNINCKX, M. Effects and side effects of school inspections: a general framework. Studies in Educational Evaluation, [S.l.], v. 52, p. 1-11, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.006

*PENNINCKX, M. et al. Effects and side effects of Flemish school inspection. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, v. 44, n. 5, p. 728-744, 2016a. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215570305

*PENNINCKX, M. et al. Enquiry into the side effects of school inspection in a ‘low-stakes’ inspection context. Research Papers in Education, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 4, p. 462-482, 2016b. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1076886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1076886

*PENNINCKX, M. et al. Explaining effects and side effects of school inspections: a path analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, [S.l.], v. 27, n. 3, p. 333-347, 2016c. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1085421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1085421

PIEZUNKA, A. Struggle for Acceptance - Maintaining External School Evaluation as an Institution in Germany. Historical Social Research, [S.l.], v. 44, n. 2, p. 270-287, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.2.270-287.

*QUESEL, C.; SCHWEINBERGER, K.; MÖSER, G. Responses to positive and negative feedback on organizational aspects of school quality: teachers’ and leaders’ views on a Swiss traffic light approach to school inspection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, [S.l.], p. 1–18, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1856886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1856886

*QUINTELIER, A.; DE MAEYER, S.; VANHOOF, J. Determinants of teachers’ feedback acceptance during a school inspection visit. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 4, p. 529-547, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1750432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1750432

REDDING, S. et al. Four domains for rapid school improvement: Indicators of effective practice. San Francisco: The Center on School Turnaround at WestEd, 2018.

REYNOLDS, D. School Effectiveness and School Improvement (SESI): links with the International Standards/Accountability Agenda. In: TOWNSEND, T. et al. (ed.). International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement, Springer International Handbooks of Education. The Netherlands: Springer International, 2007. v. 17. p. 471-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_26

REYNOLDS, D.; TEDDLIE, C. The processes of school effectiveness. In: TEDDLIE, C.; REYNOLDS, D. (ed.). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. United Kingdom: Falmer, 2000. p. 134-159.

*SAMPAIO, M.; LEITE, C. Relationships between the assessment of school quality and social justice. Educational Research, [S.l.], v. 63, n. 1, p. 133-146, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1857654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1857654

SCHEERENS, J.; EHREN, M. The evidence base for school inspection frameworks. In: EHREN, M. (ed.). Methods and modalities of effective school inspections, accountability and educational improvement. Switzerland: Springer International, 2016. p. 19-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_2

SIMEONOVA, R. et al. A continuum of approaches to school inspections: cases from Europe. Pedagogy, [S.l.], v. 92, n. 4, p. 487-506, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341333639. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2021.

SOARES, L.; SOUSA, M. Avaliação educacional ou política de resultados?. Educação & Formação, Fortaleza, v. 5, n. 3, p. 1-24, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25053/redufor.v5i15set/dez.2951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25053/redufor.v5i15set/dez.2951

*WAGNER, I. Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of follow-up classroom observations after school inspections in Northern Germany. Studies in Educational Evaluation, [S.l.], v. 67, p. 1-9, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100913

Publicado

2022-01-01

Como Citar

ALBUQUERQUE, P. D.; FERREIRA, A. G.; BARREIRA, C. M. F. As inspeções/avaliações externas de escolas: efeitos nas instituições escolares descritos em artigos publicados desde 2016. Educ. Form., [S. l.], v. 7, p. e7068, 2022. DOI: 10.25053/redufor.v7i1.7068. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/7068. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.