A (im)possibilidade do intelectual dentro da universidade neoliberal

Autores

  • Grant Banfield Flinders University
  • Helen Haduntz University of South Australia
  • Alpesh Maisuria University of East London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25053/edufor.v1i3.1974

Palavras-chave:

Trabalho intelectual, Universalidade, Neoliberalismo

Resumo

The university was born and has always existed in tension between the impulse to human freedom and resignation to the constraining powers of church, state and capital. In this era of neoliberalism where the global domination of capital is almost complete, the university has succumbed. The time has come to de-colonise, to de-capitalise and to build anew the universality (the university) of human freedom. In opening conversation around this provocation, work is drawn from a research project entitled The Changing Nature of University Academic Work. The project is an ongoing qualitative study employing in-depth interviews with Australian and English academics. It aims to shed light on how academics interpret changes over time to universities and their own day-to-day work. The analysis of interview data has revealed three dominant but inter-related themes: the rise of managerialism, the push to anti-intellectualism and the subservience of academic work to economic imperatives.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BLACKMORE, J.; BRENNAN, M. Z. L. (Ed.). Re-positioning university governance and academic work. Rotterdam: Sense, 2010.

BOUSQUET, M. How the university works: higher education and the low-wage nation. New York: New York, 2008.

BRAVERMAN, H. Labor & monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review, 1974.

BURAWOY, M. Manufacturing consent: changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1979.

FREIRE, P.; MACEDO, D. Literacy: reading the word and the world. Westport: Praeger, 1987.

HALL, S. Future City. New Left Review, n. 21, p. 65-79, 2003.

HARVEY, D. A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University, 2005.

HARVEY, D. Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile, 2014.

HARVEY, D. Spaces of global capitalism. London: Verso, 2006.

KLEIN, N. The shock doctrine. London: Penguin, 2007.

KLIMAN, A. The failure of capitalist production: underlying causes of the great recession. London: Pluto, 2012.

LEBOWITZ, M. The contradictions of “real socialism”: the conductor and the conducted. New York: Monthly Review, 2012.

MARGINSON, S. Rethinking academic work in the global era. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Abingdon, v. 22, n. 1, p. 23-35, 2000.

MARTIN, B. R. Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford, v. 36, p. 543-565, 2012.

MUMFORD, L. The city in history. Great Britain: Pelican, 1961.

NOBLE, D. America by design: science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University, 1977.

NOBLE, D. Digital diploma mills: the automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review, 2001.

OLSSEN, M.; PETERS, M. A. Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, London, v. 20, p. 313-345, 2005.

SANTOS, B. S. Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide boulder. London: Paradign, 2014.

WASHBURN, J. University, Inc.: the corporate corruption of higher education. New York: Basic, 2005.

YATES, M. Us versus them: laboring in the academic factory. Monthly Review, New York, v. 51, p. 1-4, 2000.

Downloads

Publicado

2016-09-01

Como Citar

BANFIELD, G.; HADUNTZ, H.; MAISURIA, A. A (im)possibilidade do intelectual dentro da universidade neoliberal. Educ. Form., [S. l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 3–19, 2016. DOI: 10.25053/edufor.v1i3.1974. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/redufor/article/view/110. Acesso em: 24 set. 2021.