Motion verbs in vietnamese and englis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52521/enpe.v6i1.12672Palavras-chave:
Motional verb, English, VietnameseResumo
To help students specialize languages in depth, comparing the similarities and differences between languages is necessary. The purpose of this article is to compare motion verbs in Vietnamese and English to see the similarities and differences. To achieve the goal, the author will research the theoretical basis, clearly pointing out the similarities between omnidirectional verbs in Vietnamese and English; differences in the conjugation ability of Vietnamese and English polytransitive verbs; and the possibility to apply it to teaching students. From research, the author will focus on providing discussions on this issue.
Downloads
Referências
ALI, Z.; AZAM, M. A morphological analysis of transitive and in motion verbs in lasi. Harf-O-Sukhan, 5(3), 346-356, 2021. Retrieved from. https://www.harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-o-sukhan/article/view/449.
ARONOFF, M.; FUDEMAN, K. What is morphology? John Wiley & Sons, 2022.
BALTHAZAR, C. H.; EBBELS, S.; ZWITSERLOOD, R. Explicit grammatical intervention for developmental language disorder: Three approaches. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 51(2), 226-246, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00046.
BATSUREN, K. et al. The sigmorphon 2022 shared task on morpheme segmentation, 2022. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07615.
BAUER, L. Glossary of morphology. Edinburgh University Press, 2019.
BETTI, M. J. Compounding in English and Arabic: A contrastive study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10, 1-13, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i03.001.
BI, P.; JIANG, J. Syntactic complexity in assessing young adolescent EFL learners’ writings: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. System, 91, 102248, 2020.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102248.
BONANDRINI, R. et al. Form to meaning mapping and the impact of explicit morpheme combination in novel word processing. Cognitive Psychology, 145, 101594, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101594.
BREEN, R. L. A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of geography in higher education, 30(3), 463-475, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260600927575.
CHOWDHARY, K.; CHOWDHARY, K. R. Natural language processing. Fundamentals of artificial intelligence, 603-649, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3972-7_19.
DE CLERCQ, B.; HOUSEN, A. A cross‐linguistic perspective on syntactic complexity in L2 development: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 315-334, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12396.
DELAGE, H.; FRAUENFELDER, U. H. Relationship between working memory and complex syntax in children with Developmental Language Disorder. Journal of child Language, 47(3), 600-632, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000722.
HAHN, M.; DEGEN, J.; FUTRELL, R. Modeling word and morpheme order in natural language as an efficient trade-off of memory and surprisal. Psychological Review, 128(4), 726, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000269.
HANBING, Y. I.; QIAN, L. I. U. An Sentiment Analysis Method of Hot Events Based on Automatically Labeled Corpus and Its Application. Frontiers of Data and Domputing, 4(5), 129-137, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11871/jfdc.issn.2096-742X.2022.05.014.
HASPELMATH, M. The structural uniqueness of languages and the value of comparison for language description. Asian Languages and Linguistics, 1(2), 346-366, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20032.has.
ITCHUAQIYAQ, C. U.; RANADE, N.; WALTON, R. Theory-to-query: Developing a corpus-analysis method using computer programming and human analysis. Technical Communication, 68(3), 7-28, 2021.
KAYAMA, Y.; OSHIMA-TAKANE, Y. The acquisition of argument structures of intransitive and motion verbs in Japanese: The role of parental input. First Language, 42(1), 144-167, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237211059970.
KHURANA, D.; KOLI, A.; KHATTER, K.; SINGH, S. Natural language processing: State of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia tools and applications, 82(3), 3713-3744, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4.
KLÍMOVÁ, B.; TOMAN, J. Effectiveness of the Blended Learning Approach in Teaching and Learning Selected EFL Grammar Structures at a University Level–A Case Study. In: Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning Environment: 13th International Conference, ICBL 2020, Bangkok, Thailand, August 24–27, 2020, Proceedings 13 (pp. 227-236). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_19.
KUNCORO, A. et al. Scalable syntax-aware language models using knowledge distillation. 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.06438.
KIM, D. Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519-541, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693.
LEVINE, D. et al. Evaluating socioeconomic gaps in preschoolers’ vocabulary, syntax and language process skills with the Quick Interactive Language Screener (QUILS). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 114-128, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.006.
LEE, J. W.; WOLTERS, A.; GRACE KIM, Y. S. The relations of morphological awareness with language and literacy skills vary depending on orthographic depth and nature of morphological awareness. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 528-558 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221123816.
,
LEU, T. The status of the morpheme. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.582
LÓPEZ-GARCIA, V.; RODRÍGUEZ-INÉS, P. Learning corpus linguistics tools and techniques to cope with the current challenges of audiovisual translation. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 13(3), 307-325, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656409.
LU, X.; AI, H. Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of second language writing, 29, 16-27, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003.
MAHAN, K. R. The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74-88, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879.
MANTASIAH, R.; ANWAR, M. A Preliminary Study in Developing a Contrastive and Error Analyses-based German Grammar Textbook. In: 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 419-424). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.066
NOSIROVA, D. Learning grammar through context: enhancing language proficiency. Modern Science and Research, 2(7), 349-351, 2023. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/22235
OSSA PARRA, M.; PROCTOR, C. P. Translanguaging to understand language. Tesol Quarterly, 55(3), 766-794, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3011.
PAWLAK, M. Grammar learning strategies as a key to mastering second language grammar: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 53(3), 358-370, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000314.
QIU, X. et al. Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey. Science China. Technological Sciences, 63(10), 1872-1897, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3
RICHARDS, J. C. Exploring emotions in language teaching. relc Journal, 53(1), 225-239, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220927531.
SCHLENKER, P. Iconic Syntax: sign language classifier predicates and gesture sequences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1-71, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-023-09388-z.
SHIN, N. L. Está abriendo, la abrió: Lexical knowledge, verb type, and grammatical aspect shape child heritage speakers’ direct object omission in Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(5), 842-861, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221124475.
SHOXRUX, N. Comparisons when comparing nouns in English and Uzbek: a comparative linguistic analysis. In: International Scientific and Current Research Conferences (pp. 177-180), 2003. https://www.orientalpublication.com/index.php/iscrc/article/view/1167.
SIMON-CEREIJIDO, G.; GUTIÉRREZ-CLELLEN, V. F. A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains. Applied psycholinguistics, 30(2), 315-337 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716409090134.
SIREGAR, I. Analysis of Betawi Language Interference on the Morphology of Adolescent Speech in Jakarta. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 3(8), 54-60, 2021.
STARCZEWSKA, K. K. Ludovico Marracci at work: The evolution of his Latin translation of the Qurʾān in the light of his newly discovered manuscripts. With an edition and a comparative linguistic analysis of Sura 18, by Reinhold F. Glei & Roberto Tottoli. Intellectual History of the Islamicate World, 7(1), 239-241, 2019.
TALLAS-MAHAJNA, N.; ARMON-LOTEM, S.; SAIEGH-HADDAD, E. Emergence of verb-pattern morphology in young Arabic speakers: morphological and semantic features. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1127640, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127640.
TIZJANG, E. et al. The Effect of Nicenet on Learning Grammar Structures in Writing: The Case of Iranian EFL Intermediate Learners. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 1-26, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/EFL.2023.403665.1251.
TURSUNOVICH, R. I. Modern Methods in the Methodology of Teaching a Foreign Language. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 3(12), 146-152, 2022.
VAN DUNG, V.; MINH, T. N.; DINH, D. Q. The influence of labor alienation on sustainable development in Vietnam from a philosophical perspective of Karl Marx. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 16(1), 212-226, 2024.. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2897
WANG, W.; BAO, F.; GAO, G. Learning morpheme representation for mongolian named entity recognition. Neural Processing Letters, 50, 2647-2664, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-019-10044-6.
WOLF, T. et al. Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing: system demonstrations (pp. 38-45). 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6.
YUE, X. Research on the Semantic Analysis Method of Translation Corpus Based on Natural Language Processing. Scientific Programming, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3764230.
ZAMMIT, J. Sociocultural Issues Experienced by Adults Learning Maltese as a Second Language. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-89, 2022.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EIMSS53851.2021.00061.
ZHANG, L. J.; CHENG, X. Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101043, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043.
ZHANG, Y.; LU, X.; FU, Y.; JIANG, S. A comparative linguistic analysis of English news headlines in China, USA, UK, and ASEAN countries. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 23(3), 271-285, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSE.2020.111436.
ZUBERBÜHLER, K. Evolutionary roads to syntax. Animal Behaviour, 151, 259-265, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.006.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Phuong Vo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
