Similarities and differences of duplicity in english and vietnamese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47149/pemo.v5.e10875Keywords:
similarity, differences, duplicityAbstract
Duplicity is a phenomenon that occurs when two or more words have the same tone or grammatical structure. The same language is used in many different languages, including in English and Vietnamese. In this article, the author focuses on researching the similarities and differences of duplicity in English and Vietnamese. Like other languages, in addition to the univesal rules, in English there are many "abnormal" phenomena that make users feel "absurd", "contradictory", including the phenomenon of coincidence. language. To show the validity as well as the value of these "unusual" structures is a difficult but extremely interesting problem, requiring research and clarification. In this article, the author will focus on clarifying the following issues: research on theoretical basis; Point out the similarities and differences of the phenomenon of duplicity in English and Vietnamese; Application of duplicity in learning and teaching English and Vietnamese.
Downloads
References
BENNETT, C. E. Essential Latin grammar: Bennett's grammar revised. Hackett Publishing, 2007.
CHARLES E.; BENNETT (Charles Edwin 1858-1921). New Latin grammar, Allyn and Bacon, 1918.
HORNBY, A. S.; WEHMEIER, S.; ASHBY, M. Niu Jin Xian Dai Gao Ji Yin Han Shuang Jie Ci Dian. Oxford Advanced Learner's English-Chinese Dictionary. Oxford university press, 2005.
NOFAL, K. H. Syntactic deviations/stylistic variants in poetry: Chaucer and TS Eliot as models. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, v.3, n.4, p. 282-310, 2014.
LAVIDAS, N. The Greek Septuagint and Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface: From Null’to Pleonastic Object Pronouns. Language change at the Syntax-Semantic Interface. Berlin, p.153-181, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110352306.153
BOZOROVA, G. Concerning some pleonastic and tautological constructions. центр научных публикаций (buxdu. uz), v.7, n.7, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52297/2181-1466/2021/5/2/10
STURROCK, J. Structuralism. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
PIAGET, J. Structuralism (psychology revivals). Psychology Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722368
KRONENFELD, D.; DECKER, H. W. Structuralism. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 8, n.1, p. 503-541, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.002443
HELLER, T. C. Structuralism and critique. Stan. L. Rev., v.36, n.127, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228682
BLOCK, N. J. Functionalism. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, v. 104, p. 519-539. Elsevier, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70217-4
TURNER, J. H.; MARYANSKI, A. Functionalism. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, 1979.
HOLMWOOD, J. Functionalism and its critics. Modern social theory: An introduction, v.2, p.87-110, 2005.
EAGLETON, T. Literary theory: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
JAUSS, H. R., BENZINGER, E. Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New literary history, v. 2, n.1, p.7-37, 1970.
BREWTON, V. Literary theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2005.
Sober, E. (1978). Psychologism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 8(2), 165-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00398.x
CRANE, T. Aspects of psychologism. Harvard University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726581
BLOCK, N. Psychologism and behaviorism. The Philosophical Review, v.90, n.1, 5-43, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184371
BULHOF, J.;GIMBEL, S. A tautology is a tautology (or is it?). Journal of pragmatics, v.36, n.5, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00003-1
DREBEN, B.;FLOYD, J. Tautology: How not to use a word. In Wittgenstein in Florida: Proceedings of the Colloquium on the Philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Florida State University, 7–8 August 1989 (p. 23-49). Springer Netherlands, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3552-8_2
PRIEM, R. L.; BUTLER, J. E. Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management review, v.26, n.1, p. 57-66, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011946
PAPINEAU, D. Naturalism, 2007.
FURST, L. R.; SKRINE, P. N. Naturalism (Vol. 17). Taylor & Francis, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115498
PIGDEN, C. Naturalism. 1991.
TENNANT, N. Logicism and neologicism. 2013.
FEFERMAN, S. Logic, logics, and logicism. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. 40, n.1, p. 31-54, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039096304
MACFARLANE, J. FREGE. Kant, and the logic in logicism. The philosophical review, v.111, n.1, p. 25-65, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-111-1-25
JAUSS, H. R.; BENZINGER, E. Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New literary history, v.2, n.1, p.7-37, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/468585
BREWTON, V. Literary theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2005.
RIVKIN, J.; RYAN, M. (Orgs). Literary theory: An anthology. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
PATRICK HUGHES, More on Oxymoron, Jonathan Cape Ltd, 30 Bedford Square, London, 1984.
HOURANI, F. S. Daily Bread for Your Mind and Soul: A Handbook of Transcultural Proverb and Sayings. Xlibris Corporation, 2012.
RODRÍGUEZ-MONDOÑEDO, M.; FAFULAS, S. Double possession in Peruvian Amazonian Spanish. Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics: From theory to empirical evidence, v.12, n.335, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.12.18rod
SHIN, N.; YOPÁN, R. V. Demostrativos y posesivos:(Demonstratives and Possessives). In Sintaxis del español/The Routledge handbook of Spanish syntax, Routledge, 2023, p. 427-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035633-36
GREEN, L. D. Interpreting Nietzsche: The role of style in the history of philosophy (Friedrich Nietzsche), 1999.
MARINO, M. Comedy in Comparative Literature: Essays on Dante, Hoffmann, Nietzsche, Wharton, Borges, and Cabrera Infante, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2011.645321
RICCI, G., PATRIZI, A., NERI, I., BENDANDI, B.; MASI, M. Frequency and clinical role of Staphylococcus aureus overinfection in atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatric Dermatology, v. 20, n. 5, p.389-392, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1470.2003.20503.x
RICCI, G., DONDI, A.;PATRIZI, A. Staphylococcus aureus overinfection in atopic dermatitis. Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, v. 3, n.2, 2008.
AUER, P.; RT'MFELDT, B. Prolixity as adaptation Prosody and turn-taking in German. Sound patterns in interaction. Cross-linguistic studies from conversation, 62, 171, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.11aue
HOOD, W. W.; WILSON, C. S. Overlap in bibliographic databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 54, n. 12, 1091-1103, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10301
KASHEFI, O., LUCAS, A. T., & HWA, R. Semantic Pleonasm Detection. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Human Language Technologies, v.2, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2036
BUŞILA, Alina. Master’s degree paper a contrastive analysis of legal terminology in english, romanian and polish. legal terminology innovations in the republic of Moldova. Moldova state University, 2011.
CAO, Xuan Hao. “Are brothers and sisters the same language?”. Language and life, 12(26), 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Phuong Vo (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
