The Happiest Place on Earth
A Spatial Discourse Analysis of Disney's Epcot World Showcase
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.46230/2674-8266-12-3983Mots-clés :
Spatial Discourse Analysis, Disney World Showcase, MultimodalityRésumé
Drawing on insights from a social semiotic perspective as proposed by Halliday (1985), and its adaptation to the grammar of visual design (KRESS; VAN LEEUWEN, 2006), and spatial discourse analysis (RAVELLI, 2000, RAVELLI; HEBERLE, 2016), this article aims to analyze semiotic resources used in EPCOT’s World Showcase, Disney World, Florida, USA, specifically, the eleven thematic pavilions in the attraction. The analysis considered the three metafunctions, adapted from Halliday (1985) to investigate images (KRESS; VAN LEEUWEN, 2006) as well as physical spaces (RAVELLI, 2000). Results show that the representation relies mainly on the reproduction of semiotic resources that are popular in each country in the Showcase, such as monuments, architectural styles and symbols that enable the guests to immerse in the country's culture. The immersion also happens through the consumption in shops with local products and restaurants with local foods, as well as the interaction with local cast members. The composition analysis showed a common pattern regarding the placement of items that are more approachable and real in the lower part, while items that symbolize idealization and fantasy are usually placed in the upper part of the spaces. Overall, despite the concern to portray the countries with authenticity, it can be seen that they are represented in an idealistic and fanciful way which follows the ideology of Disney’s theme parks of providing an environment of perfection and fantasy to the guests.
Téléchargements
Références
BECK, G. Dreamers and Deceivers: True Stories of the Heroes and Villains Who Made America. New York: Mercury Radio Arts, Inc, 2014.
BEZEMER, J; KRESS, G. Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A social semiotic frame. London/New York: Routledge, 2016.
DJONOV, E; ZHAO, S. Social semiotics: A theorist and a theory in retrospect. Advancing multimodal and critical discourse studies: Interdisciplinary research inspired by Theo Van Leeuwen’s social semiotics. New York and London: Routledge, 2018.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K.; MATTHIESSEN, C. M. I. M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. London: Arnold, 2004.
HJEMDAHL, K. M. History as a Cultural Playground. Ethnologia Europaea, v. 32, n. 2, p. 105-124, 2002.
HOLTORF, C. Pastness in Themed Environments. In: LUKAS, S. A. (Ed.). A Reader in Themed and Immersive Spaces. Pittsburgh: ETC Press, 2016, p. 31-37.
HOUSTON, H. R.; MEAMBER, L. A. Consuming the “world”: reflexivity, aesthetics and authenticity at Disney World’s EPCOT Center. Consumption Markets & Culture, v. 14, n. 2, p.177-191, 2011.
KRATZ, C. A.; KARP, I. Wonder and Worth: Disney Museums in World Showcase. Museum Anthropology, v. 17, n. 3, p. 32-42, 1992.
KRESS, G; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 2006.
LUKAS, S. A. Theme Park, London: Reaktion, 2008.
MILLS, S. F. Disney and the Promotions of Synthetic Worlds. American Studies International, v. 28, n. 2, p. 66-80, 1990.
MILMAN, A. Theme Park Tourism and Management Strategy. In WOODSIDE, A. G; MARTIN, D. (Ed.). Tourism management: Analysis, behavior, and strategy. Cambridge, MA: CABI, 2008, p. 218-231.
MILMAN, A. Guests’ perception of staged authenticity in a theme park: an example from Disney’s Epcot’s World Showcase. Tourism Review, v. 68, n. 4, p. 71-88, 2013.
PEDERSEN, R. A. The Epcot Explorer’s Encyclopedia: A Guide to Walt Disney World’s Greatest Theme Park. CreateSpace: USA, 2012.
RAVELLI, L. Beyond shopping: constructing the Sydney Olympics in three-dimensional text. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, v. 20, n. 4, p. 489-515, 2000.
RAVELLI, L. Museum Texts: Communication Frameworks. London: Routledge, 2006.
RAVELLI, L.; HEBERLE, V. M. Bringing a museum of language to life: the use of multimodal resources for interactional engagement in the Museu da Língua Portuguesa. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, v. 16, n. 4, p. 521-546, 2016.
RAVELLI, L.; MCMURTRIE, R. Multimodality in the Built Environment: Spatial Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.
SHEPPARD, R. Mexico Goes to Disney. Latin American Research Review, v. 51, n. 3, p. 64-84, 2016.
STENGLIN, M. Interpersonal Meaning in 3D space: How a Bonding Icon Gets Its ‘Charge’. In: L. Unsworth (Ed). Multimodal Semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education. London/New York: Continuum, 2008, p. 50-66.
UNSWORTH, L. Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University, 2001.
WERNICK, A. Promotional culture: Advertising, ideology and symbolic expression. London: Sage, 1991.
YOUNG, L.; HARRISON, C. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change. London: Continuum, 2004.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Viviane Maria Heberle, Felipe Antonio de Souza, Luiza Horbach Dodl 2021
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
Os autores que publicam na Linguagem em Foco concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação. Os artigos estão simultaneamente licenciados sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a partilha do trabalho com reconhecimento da sua autoria e da publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Os conceitos emitidos em artigos assinados são de absoluta e exclusiva responsabilidade de seus autores. Para tanto, solicitamos uma Declaração de Direito Autoral, que deve ser submetido junto ao manuscrito como Documento Suplementar.
- Os autores têm autorização para disponibilizar a versão do texto publicada na Linguagem em Foco em repositórios institucionais ou outras plataformas de distribuição de trabalhos acadêmicos (ex. ResearchGate, Academia.edu).