Transforming Gender Attitudes through Higher Education: The Ethical and Epistemic Role of Female Scholars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52521/88ape484Parole chiave:
Higher Education, SDG 4, Gender Equality, Sustainable Development, Feminist PhilosophyAbstract
Female scholars in universities provoke important philosophical questions of justice, equality, and knowledge generation in academic institutions. The paper will consider how women in higher education contribute to changing the education system to achieve sustainable development, not as a goal that is an instrument and thus relevant to one of the policy goals, such as SDG 4, but as an ethical and epistemic one. Going beyond descriptive narrations, the research provides a normative and conceptual study of female academic agency and its relevance in inclusive and equitable education. The paper, based on the feminist philosophy, political philosophy and epistemology critically evaluates the moral duty of the institutions of higher learning to respond to gender inequality and acknowledgment of the marginalized epistemic input. Exemplifying experiential knowledge is used to put philosophical reflection of the structural barriers, epistemic injustice and institutional responsibility into perspective without making empirical or statistical assertions. The discussion shows that structural and epistemic injustice of marginalization of women scholars in the teaching, research, leadership, and policy making processes is a practice that degrades the moral authority and intellectual integrity of higher education. The paper concurs that the gender equity in higher education is not only normative, but also ethically and epistemically obligatory to the establishment of just, sustainable, and inclusive knowledge systems.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Acker, S. (1994). Gendered education: Sociological reflections on women, teaching, and feminism. Open University Press.
Berenstain, N., Dotson, K., Paredes, J., Ruíz, E., & Silva, N. K. (2022). Epistemic oppression, resistance, and resurgence. Contemporary Political Theory, 21(2), 283-314.
Blackmore, J. (2014). ‘Wasting talent?’ Gender and the problematics of academic disenchantment and disengagement with leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864615
Butler, J., & Trouble, G. (1990). Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Gender trouble, 3(1), 3-17.
Casas Bañares, M. (2022). Biesta, G.(2022). World-Centred Education. A View for the Present. Routledge, 113 pp.
Crozier, G. (2023). Complaint! Sara Ahmed 2021 Durham, USA: Duke University Press£ 25.99 ISBN 9781478015093 (hbk); 9781478022336 (pbk) pp. 376.
Darder, A., Hernandez, K., Lam, K. D., & Baltodano, M. (2023). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 1-30). Routledge.
De Beauvoir, S. (2016). The second sex. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 367-377). Routledge.
Dunne, G. (2023). Epistemic injustice in education. Educational philosophy and theory, 55(3), 285-289.
Gordon, C., & Foucault, M. (1980). selected interviews and other writings 1972− 1977.
Habermas, J. (2001). On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action. mit Press.
McArthur, J. (2022). Critical theory in a decolonial age. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1681-1692.
Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.740888
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
Officer, D. R. (2024). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don't Talk about It). Innovation Journal, 29(3).
Rosa, R., & Clavero, S. (2022). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 1-7.
Sherman, B. R. (2016). There’s no (testimonial) justice: Why pursuit of a virtue is not the solution to epistemic injustice. Social Epistemology, 30(3), 229-250.
Stammler, R. (2000). The theory of justice. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd..
Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford University Press.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Rishabh Gupta, Anil Kumar, Manas Upadhyay, Pratima Singh, Neha Agrawal, Rameshwar Gupta

Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.














