Confucian Political Culture in the context of the modern World

Autori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52521/680emq98

Parole chiave:

Confucianism, Political culture, Modernization, Confucian capitalism, State-centered governance.

Abstract

Every modern nation participates in the global political process together with its own spiritual and cultural heritage. From very early on, Confucianism has become an important constitutive component of Vietnamese culture. Moreover, its political, cultural content, namely, the ethical values governing communal life, has left a profound imprint on our political culture. The study of Confucian political culture therefore possesses great theoretical and practical significance, especially from the perspective of contemporary international integration combined with the preservation of national cultural identity.

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Riferimenti bibliografici

BUROV, V. G. (1998). Social modernization of Taiwan (in Russian). Moscow.

Chinese national character (Vol. 2). (1990). Beijing.

DO, M. H. (2014). Western values in the context of contemporary social modernization in Vietnam. Journal of Philosophy, 10.

HENDRY, J. (2017). Understanding Japanese society. New York, NY: Routledge.

ISHIDA, T. (2017). Japanese political culture: Transformation and continuity. London: Routledge.

LOMANOV, A. V. (2016). Modern Confucianism: The philosophy of Han Feizi. Moscow.

NGOC, Ta Quang. (2026) The Ideology of “Rule By Virtue” and “Rule By Law” in Confucianism and the model of the Socialist Rule of Law State in Vietnam. Kalagatos, Fortaleza, vol.23, n.2, eK26023, p. 01-17. DOI: 10.52521/aexzd634. In: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/16892.

PERELOMOV, L. S. (1997). Early Confucianism and the theory of rectification of names in modern Chinese political culture. Moscow.

PERELOMOV, L. S. (2017). Early Confucianism and the theory of rectification of names in modern Chinese political culture. Moscow.

PREBISCH, P. (2012). Peripheral capitalism: Is there an alternative?. Moscow.

SARKISOV, K. O. (2016). The cultural, psychological gene of the Japanese people. In Japan at the end of the twentieth century (p. 220). Moscow.

SUN, W. (2016). The Chinese national character: From nationhood to individuality. London: Routledge.

VASILENKO, I. A. (2016). The origins of the “Pacific miracle”. Moscow.

WEBER, M. (1994). The sociology of religion. Moscow.

WEYMIN, D. (1997). The global community as reality. In Chinese philosophy and modern civilization (p. 21). Moscow.

WEYMIN, D. (1999). The challenge of Singapore: Neo-Confucian theory and the entrepreneurial spirit. Beijing.

WRIGHT, M. (2017). Continuing Chinese conservatism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

THE BOOK OF CHANGES (I Ching). (1995). In Comparative ontology of sacred texts. Moscow.

THE BOOK OF THE RULERS OF THE QING DYNASTY. (1993). Moscow.

STATE AND SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS: The Japanese model. (1996). Russian Observer, 5, 42.

THE WEST, THE NON-WEST, AND RUSSIA IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT. (1996). World Economy and International Relations, 12, 7.

Pubblicato

2026-05-02

Fascicolo

Sezione

Artigos

Come citare

Confucian Political Culture in the context of the modern World. Kalágatos , [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. e26025, 2026. DOI: 10.52521/680emq98. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/17227. Acesso em: 2 may. 2026.

Articoli simili

1-10 di 66

Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.