Confucian Political Culture in the context of the modern World

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52521/680emq98

Schlagwörter:

Confucianism, Political culture, Modernization, Confucian capitalism, State-centered governance.

Abstract

Every modern nation participates in the global political process together with its own spiritual and cultural heritage. From very early on, Confucianism has become an important constitutive component of Vietnamese culture. Moreover, its political, cultural content, namely, the ethical values governing communal life, has left a profound imprint on our political culture. The study of Confucian political culture therefore possesses great theoretical and practical significance, especially from the perspective of contemporary international integration combined with the preservation of national cultural identity.

Downloads

Download-Daten sind nocht nicht verfügbar.

Literaturhinweise

BUROV, V. G. (1998). Social modernization of Taiwan (in Russian). Moscow.

Chinese national character (Vol. 2). (1990). Beijing.

DO, M. H. (2014). Western values in the context of contemporary social modernization in Vietnam. Journal of Philosophy, 10.

HENDRY, J. (2017). Understanding Japanese society. New York, NY: Routledge.

ISHIDA, T. (2017). Japanese political culture: Transformation and continuity. London: Routledge.

LOMANOV, A. V. (2016). Modern Confucianism: The philosophy of Han Feizi. Moscow.

NGOC, Ta Quang. (2026) The Ideology of “Rule By Virtue” and “Rule By Law” in Confucianism and the model of the Socialist Rule of Law State in Vietnam. Kalagatos, Fortaleza, vol.23, n.2, eK26023, p. 01-17. DOI: 10.52521/aexzd634. In: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/16892.

PERELOMOV, L. S. (1997). Early Confucianism and the theory of rectification of names in modern Chinese political culture. Moscow.

PERELOMOV, L. S. (2017). Early Confucianism and the theory of rectification of names in modern Chinese political culture. Moscow.

PREBISCH, P. (2012). Peripheral capitalism: Is there an alternative?. Moscow.

SARKISOV, K. O. (2016). The cultural, psychological gene of the Japanese people. In Japan at the end of the twentieth century (p. 220). Moscow.

SUN, W. (2016). The Chinese national character: From nationhood to individuality. London: Routledge.

VASILENKO, I. A. (2016). The origins of the “Pacific miracle”. Moscow.

WEBER, M. (1994). The sociology of religion. Moscow.

WEYMIN, D. (1997). The global community as reality. In Chinese philosophy and modern civilization (p. 21). Moscow.

WEYMIN, D. (1999). The challenge of Singapore: Neo-Confucian theory and the entrepreneurial spirit. Beijing.

WRIGHT, M. (2017). Continuing Chinese conservatism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

THE BOOK OF CHANGES (I Ching). (1995). In Comparative ontology of sacred texts. Moscow.

THE BOOK OF THE RULERS OF THE QING DYNASTY. (1993). Moscow.

STATE AND SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS: The Japanese model. (1996). Russian Observer, 5, 42.

THE WEST, THE NON-WEST, AND RUSSIA IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT. (1996). World Economy and International Relations, 12, 7.

Veröffentlicht

2026-05-02

Zitationsvorschlag

Confucian Political Culture in the context of the modern World. Kalágatos , [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. e26025, 2026. DOI: 10.52521/680emq98. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/17227. Acesso em: 2 may. 2026.

Ähnliche Artikel

1-10 von 66

Sie können auch eine erweiterte Ähnlichkeitssuche starten für diesen Artikel nutzen.