International Security debates

toward a (re)definition of predominant perspective

Authors

  • Maria Eugenia Cardinale

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33956/tensoesmundiais.v12i22.389

Keywords:

International Relations theory, International security, Nation-State

Abstract

The debates on international security can be understood as a contest between two rival fields: on the one hand, a traditionalist and restrictive view; on the other hand, an expansive and multidimensional trend. This article examined the different interpretations involved in each field, from a critical approach of the international relations theory, and identified the predominant perspective, questioning prevailing studies in the area in a global scenario of conflicts and threats.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

CARDINALE, M. E. International Security debates: toward a (re)definition of predominant perspective. Tensões Mundiais, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 22, p. 49–78, 2018. DOI: 10.33956/tensoesmundiais.v12i22.389. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/tensoesmundiais/article/view/389. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 22 (2016): World Tensions

Section

Artigo

License

Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Licença Creative Commons