O constructo personalidade em uma perspectiva da terapia cognitiva comportamental
Considerações dos modelos de avaliação psicológica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59487/2965-1956-1-7329Palabras clave:
Evaluación de la personalidade, Psicopatologías, Técnicas de intervenciónResumen
El constructo de personalidad ha sido estudiado por áreas que buscan comprender el comportamiento humano. La noción de personalidad ha sufrido cambios significativos a lo largo de su proceso de construcción, reflejando su complejidad. El comportamiento humano está influenciado por un conjunto de factores que lo configuran, ya sean antropológicos o culturales, socioeconómicos, biológicos o fisiológicos y psicológicos. En esta dirección, la personalidad se desarrolla a lo largo de la vida, siendo influenciada por factores biopsicosociales, teniendo puntos de estabilidad y cambios a lo largodel ciclo vital. Al pensar en la personalidad en dos enfoques, el idiográfico y el nomotético, reconocemos las dimensiones que parten de lo particular, pero que consideran la dimensión colectiva. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue presentar el constructo de personalidad desde la perspectiva de la terapia cognitivo-conductual (TCC) y las consideraciones de los modelos de evaluación psicológica, además de presentar las definiciones del constructo y sus dimensiones. El conocimiento del constructo de lapersonalidad influye en la evaluación del comportamiento humano y las intervenciones de la TCC pueden ayudar a los profesionales a desarrollar estrategias de intervención cada vez más eficientes. Se concluye, con base en los estudios presentados, que la comprensión de la personalidad ejerce impactos significativos en el desarrollo de instrumentos e intervenciones efectivas.
Descargas
Citas
Carvalho, LDF, Pianowski, G, Reis, AM, Silva, RGC. Personalidade: o panorama nacional sob o foco das definições internacionais. Psicologia em Revista. 2015; 23(1), 123-146, 2017. doi: 10.5752/P.1678-9563.2017v23n1p123-146.
Pasquali L. (2000). Os Tipos Humanos: A Teoria da Personalidade. Brasília. LabPAM, 2000.
Allport GW. Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt. APA, 1937.
Baptista NJM. Teorias da personalidade. ISMAI. Portugal, 2008.
Tavares M. Validade clínica. Psico-USF. 2003; 8(2), 125-136, doi: 10.1590/S1413-82712003000200004.
Roberts BW, Nickel, LB. A critical evaluation of the Neo-Socioanalytic Personality Development Across the Lifespan. 2017; 157–177. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804674-6.00011-9.
Beck, AT, Freeman, A, Davis DD. Terapia Cognitiva dos Transtornos de Personalidade. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2005
Cloninger SC. Teorias da personalidade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 2003.
Diener E, Lucas RE. Personality Traits. In: Diener-Biswas, R, Diener E. Noba textbook series: Psychology.Champaign, IL: DEF publishers; 2018.
Millon T, Davis RD. Disorders of Personality. New York: Wiley; 1996.
Wiggins JS.Paradigms of Personality Assessment. New York: Guilford, 2003.
Lee K, Ashton, MC.Psychometric properties of the hexaco personality inventory. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2004; 39(2),329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
Holland JL. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers. Prentice-Hall, Prentice-Hall series in counseling and human development, 1973.
McCrae RR, Allik, J. The Five-Factor model of personality across cultures.New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
McCrae RR. Cross-Cultural Research on the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2002;4(4). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1038.
Trull TJ, Durrett, CA. Categorical and Dimensional Models of Personality Disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2005; 1(1), 355–380. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102, 20.
Nunes CHSSN, Zanon C, Hutz, CL. Avaliação da Personalidade a Partir de Teorias Fatoriais de Personalidade. In: Trentini CM, Bandeira DR, Hutz, CL. Avaliação Psicológica da Inteligência e da Personalidade. Porto Alegre:Artmed; 2018.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R:Professional Manual, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc;1992.
Shi B, Dai, DY, Lu Y. Openness to Experience as a Moderator of the Relationship between Intelligence and Creative Thinking: A Study of Chinese Children in Urban and Rural Areas. Front. Psychol. 7:641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00641, 2016.
Ackerman PL, Heggestad ED. Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits. Psychol. 1997; Bull. 121(2), 219.
Kaufman SB, Quilty LC, Grazioplene RG, Hirsh JB, GrayJR, Peterson, JB, DeYoung, CG. Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. J. Pers. 2015; 84, 248–258. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12156.
Kerr B, McKay R. Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: profiling creative adolescents. Creat. Res. 2013. J. 25, 21–32. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.752180
Ziegler M, Cengia A, Mussel P, Gerstorf D. Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: the openness-fluid-crystallized-intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood. Psychol. 2015; Aging 30, 573–588. doi: 10.1037/a0039493.
McCrae RR, Costa PT. The five-factor theory of personality. In: John OP, Robins RW, Pervin, LA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. The Guilford Press; 2008.
Hayes N, Joseph S. Big 5 correlates of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality Individ. Differ. 2003; 34(4), 723–727. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00057-0.
Thoresen CJ, Kaplan SA, Barsky AP, Warren CR, de Chermont K. The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. In: 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto: An Earlier Version of This Study Was Presented at the Aforementioned Conference. American Psychological Association, 2003.
Hogan R, Curphy GJ, Hogan J. What we know about leadership: effectiveness and personality. Am. Psychol. 1994; 49(6), 493-504. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493.
Soto CJ, Kronauer A, Liang JK. Five-Factor Model of Personality. The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging, 1–5, 2015. doi:10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa0.
Carlo G, Okun MA, Knight, GP, de Guzman MRT. The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2005; 38(6), 1293–1305.
LePine JA, Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001; 86(2), 326. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.
Sackett PR, Walmsley, PT. Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspect. Psychol. 2014; Sci. 9(5), 538–551. doi: 10.1177/1745691614543972.
Soto CJ, John OP. Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality. 2017; 68, 69–81.doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
Noftle EE, Robins RW. Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2007; 93(1), 116. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116.
Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychol. 2004; Bull. 130 (6), 887. doi:10.1037 / 0033-2909.130.6.887.
Ormel J, Bastiaansen A, Riese H, Bos EH, Servaas M, Ellenbogen M, Rosmalen JG, Aleman A. The biological and psychological basis of neuroticism: current status and future directions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013; 37(1), 59–72. doi:10.1016 / j.neubiorev.2012.09.004.
Resolução N° 009, de 25 de abril de 2018. Estabelece diretrizes para a realização de Avaliação Psicológica no exercício profissional da psicóloga e do psicólogo, regulamenta o Sistema de Avaliação de Testes Psicológicos -SATEPSI e revoga as Resoluções n° 002/2003, n° 006/2004 e n° 005/2012 e Notas Técnicas n° 01/2017 e 02/2017. Brasília, DF: Conselho Federal de Psicologia.
Hutz CS, Bandeira DR, Trentini C.M, Krug J.S. Psicodiagnóstico. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2016.
Urbina S. Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley; 2014.
Noronha APP, Barros MVC, Nunes MFO, Santos AAA. Avaliação psicológica: Importância e domínio de atividades segundo docentes. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 2014; 14(2), 524-538.
CUNHA JA. Psicodiagnóstico. -V. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul; 2000.
Mazer AK, Macedo BBD, Jurena MF. Transtornos de Personalidade. Medicina. 2017. 50: 85-97(1).
John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: theory and research. NewYork: Guilford (in press); 1999.
Costa PT, Mccrae RR. Revised NEO-PI-R and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
Clark LA, Cuthbert B, Lewis-Fernández R, Narrow WE, Reed GM. Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2017.18(2), 72–145. doi:10.1177/1529100617727266.
Bertsch K, Herpertz SC. Personality Disorders, Functioning and Health. Psychopathology 2018; 51(2), 69–70. doi:10.1159/000487971.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition.Washington (DC): APA; 2013.
Sevecke K, Schmeck K, Krischer M. The dimensional-categorical hybrid model of personality disorders in DSM-5 from an adolescent psychiatric perspective -criticism and critical outlook. Zeitschriftfür Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2014; 42(4) 279–283. doi: 10.1024 / 1422-4917 / a000300.
Krueger RF, Hobbs AA. An Overview of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. Psychopathology. 2020; 53, 126-132. doi:10.1159/000508538.
Huprich S. Moving beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology assessment and diagnosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2018; 213(6), 685-689. doi:10.1192/bjp.2018.149.
Knapp P, Beck AT. Fundamentos, modelos conceituais, aplicações epesquisa da terapia cognitiva. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. 2008; 30(2):54-64. doi: 10.1590/S1516-44462008000600002.
Greenberger D, Padesky, CA. A mente vencendo o humor: Mude como você se sente, mudando o modo como você pensa. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2017.
zimmerman M, Black DH. Redefining Personality disorders:proposedrevisionforDSM-5.CurrentPsychiatry. 2011; 10:,26-38.
Araújo CF, Shinohara H. Avaliação e diagnóstico em terapia cognitivo-comportamental. Interação em Psicologia, 2002; 6(1), 37-43. doi:10.5380/psi.v6i1.3191.
Hunsley J, Allan T. Clinical assessment in cognitive-behavioral therapies. In: Dobson, KS, Dozois, DJA. Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. The GuilfordPress; 2019.
Ridolfi ME, Gunderson, JG. Psychoeducation for patients with borderline personality disorder. In: Livesley, WJ, Larstone, R. Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment. The Guilford Press; 2018.
Leahy RL. Vença a depressão antes que ela vença você.Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015.
Agostinho TF, Donadon MF, Bullamah, SK. Terapia cognitivo-comportamental e depressão: intervenções no ciclo de manutenção. Revista Brasileira de Terapias Cognitivas. 2019; 15(1), 59-65. doi: 10.5935/1808-5687.20190009.
Cordioli AV, Knapp P. A terapia cognitivo-comportamental no tratamento dos transtornos mentais: editorial. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. 2008; 30 (2) 51-53. doi: 10.1590/S1516-44462008000600001.
Oliveira NH, Benetti, SPC. Aliança terapêutica: estabelecimento, manutenção e rupturas da relação. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia. 2015; 67(3):125-138.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Maria Suely Alves Costa, André Sousa Rocha
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
