Habitar de Hermes pode acomodar formas de vida [in]cômodas no Antropoceno?

Leonardo Marques Kussler

Auteurs

Leonardo Marques Kussler UERGS

Mots-clés :

Hermenêutica Filosófica, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Formas de vida, Habitar no Antropoceno

Résumé

Pensar sobre o habitar é pensar sobre o modo como seres humanos vivem no mundo, mas em que medida a hermenêutica pode dizer algo sobre o assunto? É tentando responder essa pergunta que, neste artigo, me proponho a abordar, na primeira seção, o que seriam formas de vida [in]cômodas no Antropoceno, partindo de uma análise etimológica e relacionando-a ao desdobramento do viver com do ser humano que projeta sua vida em meio a outros entes humanos e não humanos. Na segunda seção, argumento que o habitar de Hermes, isto é, o modo de ser hermenêutico pode auxiliar no processo de pensar e viver de forma mais comunitária e sustentável. Por fim, pondero sobre como os aspectos de ética e alteridade da hermenêutica gadameriana podem amparar problemas que tocam todos nós enquanto espécie, possibilitando que sejamos mais compreensivos, acolhedores e protetores do mesmo espaço que habitamos.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Leonardo Marques Kussler, UERGS

Doutor em Filosofia pela UNISINOS (2018), pós-doutor pela mesma instituição (2019-2020), pesquisador visitante PDCTR FAPEPI/CNPq na UFPI (2019-2021).
Atualmente, realiza pesquisa de pós-doutorado na UERGS.

Références

BATISTA, G. S. Gadamer e a questão ambiental. Revista do NUFEN, v. 12, n. 1, p. 41-51, 2020a. Disponível em: <http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/rnufen/v12n1/a04.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. A relevância da arquitetura no pensamento de Gadamer. Curitiba: Editora CRV, 2020b.

BIRD, G. Containing community: from political economy to ontology in Agamben, Esposito, and Nancy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016.

BOTIN, L.; HYAMS, I. B. (eds.). Postphenomenology and architecture: human technology relations in the built environment. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2021.

BRIGGLE, A. Thinking through climate change: a philosophy of energy in the anthropocene. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

BRUNDTLAND, G. H. Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. Oslo: [s.n.]. Disponível em: <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf>. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.

CANEY, S. Climate justice. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-climate/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

DAVEY, N. Towards a community of the plural: philosophical pluralism, hermeneutics, and practice. In: HEIDEN, G.-J. (ed.). Phenomenological perspectives on plurality. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014. p. 88-102.

______. Lived experience: Erlebnis and Erfahrung. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 236-332.

DAVIA, C. Gadamer’s phenomenological ethics. European Journal of Philosophy, v. 29, n. 4, p. 746-757, 2021. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejop.12602>. Acesso em: 10 fev.

DE CLERQ, R. Architecture. In: RIBEIRO, A. C. (ed.). The Continuum companion to aesthetics. London; New York: Continuum, 2012. p. 201-214.

DI CESARE, D. It is time for philosophy to return to the city. Journal of Continental Philosophy, v. 1, n. 2, p. 201-216, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.pdcnet.org/jcp/content/jcp_2020_0001_0002_0201_0216>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

DOSTAL, R. J. Gadamer’s hermeneutics: between phenomenology and dialectic. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2022.

DUFRESNE, T. The democracy of suffering: life on the edge of catastrophe, philosophy in the anthropocene. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019.

DUSSEL, E. Ética comunitaria. Madrid: Ediciones Paulinas, 1986.

ELLIOTT, B. Constructing community: configurations of the social in contemporary philosophy and urbanism. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010.

ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2018.

ESPOSITO, R. Bios: biopolítica e filosofia. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.

FISHER, S. Philosophy of architecture. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/architecture/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

FLUSSER, V. The shape of things: a philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.

FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.

______. Nascimento da biopolítica: curso dado no Collège de France (1978-1979). São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

FRANCE, R. L. (ed.). Handbook of regenerative landscape design. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007.

FRY, T. Defuturing: a new design philosophy. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.

FULFORD, A.; LOCKROBIN, G.; SMITH, R. (eds.). Philosophy and community: theories, practices and possibilities. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

GADAMER, H.-G. Verdade e método: traços fundamentais de uma hermenêutica filosófica. 3. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1999.

GADAMER, H.-G. A hermenêutica como tarefa teórica e prática (1978). In: ______. Verdade e método II: complementos e índice. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002. p. 349-369.

______. A ideia da filosofia prática (1983). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012a. p. 254-263.

______. Cidadãos de dois mundos (1985). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012b. p. 241-253.

______. Europa e o oikoumene (1993). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012c. p. 283-300.

______. Platos dialektische Ethik: Phämenologische Interpretationen zum Philebos. 5. ed. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2016.

______. Homeland and language (1992). In: VANDEVELDE, P.; IYER, A. (eds.). The selected works of Hans-Georg Gadamer: volume II. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. p. 177-181.

GAGE, M. F. (ed.). Aesthetics equals politics: new discourses across art, architecture, and philosophy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2019.

GARCÉS, M. Un mundo común. Barcelona: Ediciones Bellaterra, 2013.

GEORGE, T. The responsibility to understand. In: HEIDEN, G.-J. (ed.). Phenomenological perspectives on plurality. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014. p. 103-120.

______. Hermeneutic responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the impetus of interpretive engagement. Duquesne Studies in Phenomenology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2020a. Disponível em: <https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=dsp>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. The responsibility to understand. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020b.

GILL, S. “Holding oneself open in a conversation” – Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue. Journal of Dialogue Studies, v. 3, n. 1, p. 9-28, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.dialoguestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Journal_of_Dialogue_Studies_Vol_3_No_1_Holding_Oneself_Open_in_a_Conversation_Gadamer-s_Philosophical_Hermeneutics_and_the_Ethics_of_Dialogue.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

GJESDAL, K. Davidson and Gadamer on Plato’s dialectical ethics. In: MACHAMER, P.; WOLTERS, G. (eds.). Interpretation: ways of thinking about the sciences and the arts. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010. p. 66-90.

HARRIES, K. The ethical function of architecture. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.

HEIDEGGER, M. A questão da técnica. In: ______. Ensaios e conferências. 8. ed. Petrópolis; Bragança Paulista: Vozes; Editora Universitária São Francisco, 2012. p. 11-38.

HUANG, Y. A copper rule versus the golden rule: a Daoist-Confucian proposal for global ethics. Philosophy East and West, v. 55, n. 3, p. 394-425, 2005. Disponível em: <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/184698/pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

HULIN, L. InHabiting space: archaeologists, objects and architecture. In: BUXTON, A.; HULIN, L.; ANDERSON, J. (eds.). InHabit: people, places and possessions. London: Peter Lang UK, 2017. p. 21-36.

JONAS, H. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Puc-Rio, 2006.

KÖGLER, H.-H. Ethics and community. In: MALPAS, J.; GANDER, H.-H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to hermeneutics. London; New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 137-148.

KROES, P. Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter: a philosophy of engineering design. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

LATOUR, B. Facing Gaia. Cambridge; Malden: Polity, 2017.

______. Onde aterrar? Como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020.

LAWN, C. Gadamer: a guide for the perplexed. London; New York: Continuum, 2006.

LAWN, C.; KEANE, N. The Gadamer dictionary. London; New York: Continuum, 2011.

LIDDELL, H. G.; SCOTT, R. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

MAARTEN, F.; LOKHORST, G.-J.; POEL, I. Philosophy of technology. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MANG, P.; HAGAARD, B. Regenerative development and design: a framework for evolving sustainability. Hoboken: Wiley, 2016.

MCMYLER, B. Gadamer and the authenticity of openness. Episteme, v. XI, p. 35-46, 2000. Disponível em: <https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=episteme>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MEHMEL, C.-A. Possibility of hermeneutic conversation and ethics. Theoria and Praxis, v. 4, n. 1, p. 16-31, 2016. Disponível em: <https://theoriandpraxis.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/theoriandpraxis/article/download/39749/35991>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MORTON, T. Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

______. Dark ecology: for a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.

______. Being ecological. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018.

MURPHY, J. W. Community-based interventions: philosophy and action. New York: Springer New York, 2014.

NELSON, E. S. Life and world. In: MALPAS, J.; GANDER, H.-H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to hermeneutics. London; New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 378-389.

OJAKANGAS, M. Polis and Oikos: the art of politics in the Greek city-state. The European Legacy, v. 25, n. 4, p. 404-420, 2020. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2020.1721828>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

PARSONS, G. Nature, aesthetic values, and urban design: building the natural city. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008. p. 341-354.

POEL, I.; GORP, A. Deciding on ethical issues in engineering design. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 77-90.

RAFFNSØE, S. Philosophy of the Anthropocene: the human turn. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

RISSER, J. Language and alterity. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 122-129.

______. Hearing the other: communication as shared life. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, p. 1-17, 2019. Disponível em: <https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/68707/53233>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ROHDEN, L. Ethical assumptions and implications of hermeneutic practice as practical wisdom. Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. 5-20, 2020a. Disponível em: <https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/431>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. A virtude da solidariedade na hermenêutica enquanto um jogo de fusão de horizontes. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 19, n. 1, p. 135-148, 2020b. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2020v19n1p135/43333>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. O outro também pode ter razão - para além de ele ter apenas seus direitos reconhecidos. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, v. 62, n. 148, p. 259-276, 2021. Disponível em: < https://www.scielo.br/j/kr/a/zQ44GG4VVXD9tjHFxCcLGhz/?format=pdf&lang=pt>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. On the hermeneuticus I as a presupposition of ethical hermeneutics. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 21, n. 2, p. 400-417, 2022. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/download/87177/51908>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ROÖS, P. B. Regenerative-adaptive design for sustainable development. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

ROY, J. “Polis” and “Oikos” in Classical Athens. Greece & Rome, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-18, 1999. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/643032>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

SCHALOW, F. Heidegger’s ecological turn: community and practice for future. New York: Routledge, 2021.

SCHMIDT, D. J. Hermeneutics as original ethics. In: SULLIVAN, S.; SCHMIDT, D. J. (eds.). Difficulties of ethical life. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008. p. 35-47.

______. On the sources of ethical life. Research in Phenomenology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 35–48, 2012. Disponível em: <https://brill.com/view/journals/rip/42/1/article-p35_3.xml>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. Hermeneutics and ethical life: on the return to factical life. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 65-71.

______. Where Ethics Begins . . . Epoché, v. 22, n. 1, p. 159-175, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.pdcnet.org/epoche/content/epoche_2017_0022_0001_0159_0175>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. Philosophical life and moral responsibility: wozu Philosophie? In: FIGAL, G.; ZIMMERMANN, B. (eds.). International yearbook for hermeneutics. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.

______. Gadamer, humanism, and the humanities. In: GEORGE, T.; HEIDEN, G.-J. (eds.). The Gadamerian mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 37-48.

SNODGRASS, A.; COYNE, R. Interpretation in architecture: design as a way of thinking. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.

VERBEEK, P.-P. Morality in design: design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 91–104.

VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008.

VESSEY, D. Dialogue, goodwill, and community. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 312-319.

VEZZOLI, C.; MANZINI, E. Design for environmental sustainability. London: Springer London, 2008.

WARNKE, G. Hermeneutics, ethics, and politics. In: DOSTAL, R. J. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 79-101.

______. Gadamer on solidarity. In: GEORGE, T.; HEIDEN, G.-J. (eds.). The Gadamerian mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 78-89.

WILLIS, A.-M. Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers, v. 4, n. 2, p. 69-92, 2006. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.2752/144871306X13966268131514>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ZARI, M. P. Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. London; New York: Routledge, 2018.