Habitar de Hermes pode acomodar formas de vida [in]cômodas no Antropoceno?

Leonardo Marques Kussler

Authors

Leonardo Marques Kussler UERGS

Keywords:

Hermenêutica Filosófica, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Formas de vida, Habitar no Antropoceno

Abstract

Pensar sobre o habitar é pensar sobre o modo como seres humanos vivem no mundo, mas em que medida a hermenêutica pode dizer algo sobre o assunto? É tentando responder essa pergunta que, neste artigo, me proponho a abordar, na primeira seção, o que seriam formas de vida [in]cômodas no Antropoceno, partindo de uma análise etimológica e relacionando-a ao desdobramento do viver com do ser humano que projeta sua vida em meio a outros entes humanos e não humanos. Na segunda seção, argumento que o habitar de Hermes, isto é, o modo de ser hermenêutico pode auxiliar no processo de pensar e viver de forma mais comunitária e sustentável. Por fim, pondero sobre como os aspectos de ética e alteridade da hermenêutica gadameriana podem amparar problemas que tocam todos nós enquanto espécie, possibilitando que sejamos mais compreensivos, acolhedores e protetores do mesmo espaço que habitamos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Leonardo Marques Kussler, UERGS

Doutor em Filosofia pela UNISINOS (2018), pós-doutor pela mesma instituição (2019-2020), pesquisador visitante PDCTR FAPEPI/CNPq na UFPI (2019-2021).
Atualmente, realiza pesquisa de pós-doutorado na UERGS.

References

BATISTA, G. S. Gadamer e a questão ambiental. Revista do NUFEN, v. 12, n. 1, p. 41-51, 2020a. Disponível em: <http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/rnufen/v12n1/a04.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. A relevância da arquitetura no pensamento de Gadamer. Curitiba: Editora CRV, 2020b.

BIRD, G. Containing community: from political economy to ontology in Agamben, Esposito, and Nancy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016.

BOTIN, L.; HYAMS, I. B. (eds.). Postphenomenology and architecture: human technology relations in the built environment. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2021.

BRIGGLE, A. Thinking through climate change: a philosophy of energy in the anthropocene. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

BRUNDTLAND, G. H. Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. Oslo: [s.n.]. Disponível em: <https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf>. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.

CANEY, S. Climate justice. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-climate/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

DAVEY, N. Towards a community of the plural: philosophical pluralism, hermeneutics, and practice. In: HEIDEN, G.-J. (ed.). Phenomenological perspectives on plurality. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014. p. 88-102.

______. Lived experience: Erlebnis and Erfahrung. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 236-332.

DAVIA, C. Gadamer’s phenomenological ethics. European Journal of Philosophy, v. 29, n. 4, p. 746-757, 2021. Disponível em: <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejop.12602>. Acesso em: 10 fev.

DE CLERQ, R. Architecture. In: RIBEIRO, A. C. (ed.). The Continuum companion to aesthetics. London; New York: Continuum, 2012. p. 201-214.

DI CESARE, D. It is time for philosophy to return to the city. Journal of Continental Philosophy, v. 1, n. 2, p. 201-216, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.pdcnet.org/jcp/content/jcp_2020_0001_0002_0201_0216>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

DOSTAL, R. J. Gadamer’s hermeneutics: between phenomenology and dialectic. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2022.

DUFRESNE, T. The democracy of suffering: life on the edge of catastrophe, philosophy in the anthropocene. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2019.

DUSSEL, E. Ética comunitaria. Madrid: Ediciones Paulinas, 1986.

ELLIOTT, B. Constructing community: configurations of the social in contemporary philosophy and urbanism. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010.

ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham; London: Duke University Press, 2018.

ESPOSITO, R. Bios: biopolítica e filosofia. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004.

FISHER, S. Philosophy of architecture. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/architecture/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

FLUSSER, V. The shape of things: a philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.

FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1987.

______. Nascimento da biopolítica: curso dado no Collège de France (1978-1979). São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

FRANCE, R. L. (ed.). Handbook of regenerative landscape design. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007.

FRY, T. Defuturing: a new design philosophy. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.

FULFORD, A.; LOCKROBIN, G.; SMITH, R. (eds.). Philosophy and community: theories, practices and possibilities. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

GADAMER, H.-G. Verdade e método: traços fundamentais de uma hermenêutica filosófica. 3. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1999.

GADAMER, H.-G. A hermenêutica como tarefa teórica e prática (1978). In: ______. Verdade e método II: complementos e índice. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2002. p. 349-369.

______. A ideia da filosofia prática (1983). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012a. p. 254-263.

______. Cidadãos de dois mundos (1985). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012b. p. 241-253.

______. Europa e o oikoumene (1993). In: ______. Hermenêutica em retrospectiva. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2012c. p. 283-300.

______. Platos dialektische Ethik: Phämenologische Interpretationen zum Philebos. 5. ed. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2016.

______. Homeland and language (1992). In: VANDEVELDE, P.; IYER, A. (eds.). The selected works of Hans-Georg Gadamer: volume II. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. p. 177-181.

GAGE, M. F. (ed.). Aesthetics equals politics: new discourses across art, architecture, and philosophy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2019.

GARCÉS, M. Un mundo común. Barcelona: Ediciones Bellaterra, 2013.

GEORGE, T. The responsibility to understand. In: HEIDEN, G.-J. (ed.). Phenomenological perspectives on plurality. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014. p. 103-120.

______. Hermeneutic responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the impetus of interpretive engagement. Duquesne Studies in Phenomenology, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2020a. Disponível em: <https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=dsp>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. The responsibility to understand. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020b.

GILL, S. “Holding oneself open in a conversation” – Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue. Journal of Dialogue Studies, v. 3, n. 1, p. 9-28, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.dialoguestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Journal_of_Dialogue_Studies_Vol_3_No_1_Holding_Oneself_Open_in_a_Conversation_Gadamer-s_Philosophical_Hermeneutics_and_the_Ethics_of_Dialogue.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

GJESDAL, K. Davidson and Gadamer on Plato’s dialectical ethics. In: MACHAMER, P.; WOLTERS, G. (eds.). Interpretation: ways of thinking about the sciences and the arts. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010. p. 66-90.

HARRIES, K. The ethical function of architecture. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.

HEIDEGGER, M. A questão da técnica. In: ______. Ensaios e conferências. 8. ed. Petrópolis; Bragança Paulista: Vozes; Editora Universitária São Francisco, 2012. p. 11-38.

HUANG, Y. A copper rule versus the golden rule: a Daoist-Confucian proposal for global ethics. Philosophy East and West, v. 55, n. 3, p. 394-425, 2005. Disponível em: <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/184698/pdf>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

HULIN, L. InHabiting space: archaeologists, objects and architecture. In: BUXTON, A.; HULIN, L.; ANDERSON, J. (eds.). InHabit: people, places and possessions. London: Peter Lang UK, 2017. p. 21-36.

JONAS, H. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Puc-Rio, 2006.

KÖGLER, H.-H. Ethics and community. In: MALPAS, J.; GANDER, H.-H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to hermeneutics. London; New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 137-148.

KROES, P. Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter: a philosophy of engineering design. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

LATOUR, B. Facing Gaia. Cambridge; Malden: Polity, 2017.

______. Onde aterrar? Como se orientar politicamente no Antropoceno. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2020.

LAWN, C. Gadamer: a guide for the perplexed. London; New York: Continuum, 2006.

LAWN, C.; KEANE, N. The Gadamer dictionary. London; New York: Continuum, 2011.

LIDDELL, H. G.; SCOTT, R. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.

MAARTEN, F.; LOKHORST, G.-J.; POEL, I. Philosophy of technology. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MANG, P.; HAGAARD, B. Regenerative development and design: a framework for evolving sustainability. Hoboken: Wiley, 2016.

MCMYLER, B. Gadamer and the authenticity of openness. Episteme, v. XI, p. 35-46, 2000. Disponível em: <https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=episteme>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MEHMEL, C.-A. Possibility of hermeneutic conversation and ethics. Theoria and Praxis, v. 4, n. 1, p. 16-31, 2016. Disponível em: <https://theoriandpraxis.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/theoriandpraxis/article/download/39749/35991>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

MORTON, T. Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

______. Dark ecology: for a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.

______. Being ecological. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2018.

MURPHY, J. W. Community-based interventions: philosophy and action. New York: Springer New York, 2014.

NELSON, E. S. Life and world. In: MALPAS, J.; GANDER, H.-H. (eds.). The Routledge companion to hermeneutics. London; New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 378-389.

OJAKANGAS, M. Polis and Oikos: the art of politics in the Greek city-state. The European Legacy, v. 25, n. 4, p. 404-420, 2020. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2020.1721828>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

PARSONS, G. Nature, aesthetic values, and urban design: building the natural city. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008. p. 341-354.

POEL, I.; GORP, A. Deciding on ethical issues in engineering design. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 77-90.

RAFFNSØE, S. Philosophy of the Anthropocene: the human turn. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

RISSER, J. Language and alterity. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 122-129.

______. Hearing the other: communication as shared life. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, p. 1-17, 2019. Disponível em: <https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/68707/53233>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ROHDEN, L. Ethical assumptions and implications of hermeneutic practice as practical wisdom. Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies, v. 10, n. 2, p. 5-20, 2020a. Disponível em: <https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/431>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. A virtude da solidariedade na hermenêutica enquanto um jogo de fusão de horizontes. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 19, n. 1, p. 135-148, 2020b. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/1677-2954.2020v19n1p135/43333>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. O outro também pode ter razão - para além de ele ter apenas seus direitos reconhecidos. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, v. 62, n. 148, p. 259-276, 2021. Disponível em: < https://www.scielo.br/j/kr/a/zQ44GG4VVXD9tjHFxCcLGhz/?format=pdf&lang=pt>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. On the hermeneuticus I as a presupposition of ethical hermeneutics. ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Philosophy, v. 21, n. 2, p. 400-417, 2022. Disponível em: <https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/download/87177/51908>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ROÖS, P. B. Regenerative-adaptive design for sustainable development. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.

ROY, J. “Polis” and “Oikos” in Classical Athens. Greece & Rome, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-18, 1999. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/643032>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

SCHALOW, F. Heidegger’s ecological turn: community and practice for future. New York: Routledge, 2021.

SCHMIDT, D. J. Hermeneutics as original ethics. In: SULLIVAN, S.; SCHMIDT, D. J. (eds.). Difficulties of ethical life. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008. p. 35-47.

______. On the sources of ethical life. Research in Phenomenology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 35–48, 2012. Disponível em: <https://brill.com/view/journals/rip/42/1/article-p35_3.xml>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. Hermeneutics and ethical life: on the return to factical life. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 65-71.

______. Where Ethics Begins . . . Epoché, v. 22, n. 1, p. 159-175, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.pdcnet.org/epoche/content/epoche_2017_0022_0001_0159_0175>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

______. Philosophical life and moral responsibility: wozu Philosophie? In: FIGAL, G.; ZIMMERMANN, B. (eds.). International yearbook for hermeneutics. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.

______. Gadamer, humanism, and the humanities. In: GEORGE, T.; HEIDEN, G.-J. (eds.). The Gadamerian mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 37-48.

SNODGRASS, A.; COYNE, R. Interpretation in architecture: design as a way of thinking. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.

VERBEEK, P.-P. Morality in design: design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In: VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design: from engineering to architecture. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008. p. 91–104.

VERMAAS, P. E. et al. (eds.). Philosophy and design. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008.

VESSEY, D. Dialogue, goodwill, and community. In: KEANE, N.; LAWN, C. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to hermeneutics. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. p. 312-319.

VEZZOLI, C.; MANZINI, E. Design for environmental sustainability. London: Springer London, 2008.

WARNKE, G. Hermeneutics, ethics, and politics. In: DOSTAL, R. J. (ed.). The Cambridge companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 79-101.

______. Gadamer on solidarity. In: GEORGE, T.; HEIDEN, G.-J. (eds.). The Gadamerian mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 78-89.

WILLIS, A.-M. Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers, v. 4, n. 2, p. 69-92, 2006. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.2752/144871306X13966268131514>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2023.

ZARI, M. P. Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. London; New York: Routledge, 2018.