Digital goods and the "value paradox": An approach from Marxist political economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52521/vfadn676

Keywords:

Digital goods, value paradox, labor value theory, Marxist monopoly price, Marxist political economy

Abstract

This article analyzes the "value paradox" of digital goods, the phenomenon of marginal reproduction costs approaching zero, but market prices remain high within the framework of Marxist political economy. While neoclassical economics predicts that prices will tend to be close to zero under conditions of perfect competition and infinite replication, digital market practice suggests a proprietary pricing trend, creating a significant theoretical gap. The study argues that current approaches, including neoclassical theory and some research directions on digital labor, do not clearly distinguish between data, labor, and goods, and tend to equate value with price. On the basis of this critique, the paper proposes a new analytical framework, distinguishing between raw data, digital production materials, and complete digital goods. By means of dialectical materialism, the study demonstrates that the value of digital goods is still based on the social labor required, while prices are increasingly dominated by technological monopoly structures. The concept of "technological monopoly" is proposed to explain this pricing mechanism, thereby contributing to the development of critical theory of contemporary digital capitalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AZHAR, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution and labour: a Marxian theory of digital production. Review of Socio-Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 103–124.

BAKER, J. (2026). The economics of intangible concentration: Power laws, intangible assets, and intellectual monopoly. American Economic Association Conference Papers.

DURAND, C. (2023). Techno-féodalisme: Critique de l'économie politique du numérique. Paris: Zones.

FUCHS, C. (2015). Dallas Smythe today: The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory. In Marx and the Political Economy of the Media (pp. 522–599). Brill.

GINTIS, H. (1976). The nature of labor exchange and the theory of capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics, 8(2), 36–54.

HOJNIK, J. (2017). Technology neutral EU law: Digital goods within the traditional goods/services distinction. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 25(1), 63–84.

HUANG, D. (2025). Techno-feudalism and the problem of “general intellect” in the digital economy. Studies on Marxism (forthcoming).

MARX, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy, Volume I. London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867).

MARX, K. (1981). Capital: A critique of political economy, Volume III. London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1894).

NEWMAN, J. M. (2018). The myth of free. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 86, 513.

NORRIS, A. K., & Espinosa, T. (2026). A Marxian political economy of Big Tech and AI: Profits vs. rents. American Economic Association Conference Papers.

OLLMAN, B. (1977). The metamorphosis of value. In Alienation: Marx's conception of man in a capitalist society (pp. 187–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SANTOS, D. M., & SANTOS, P. C. dos. (2023). Arqueologia e genealogia da vigilância e seus desdobramentos nas redes sociais e no ensino da Cultura Digital. Revista Cacto - Ciência, Arte, Comunicação Em Transdisciplinaridade Online, 3(2), e23028. https://doi.org/10.31416/cacto.v3i2.858

SRNICEK, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

VAROUFAKIS, Y. (2023). Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. London: Bodley Head.

WANG, F. (2023). Labor, commodity, and capital under the condition of digital economy: An analysis based on Marx’s Capital and the manuscripts. Studies on Marxism, 12.

WITTEL, A. (2016). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. In Marx in the age of digital capitalism (pp. 68–104). Brill.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02

How to Cite

Digital goods and the "value paradox": An approach from Marxist political economy. Kalagatos, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. e26027, 2026. DOI: 10.52521/vfadn676. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/kalagatos/article/view/17644. Acesso em: 4 may. 2026.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 61

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.