Collaboration, empathy, and prosociality among professors

un análisis en el contexto de la UEMG Campanha

Authors

  • Dênis Mateus de Paiva Doutorando em Políticas Públicas pela Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC) Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (UEMG), Campanha, Minas Gerais, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-7278

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2026.16.35.17115

Keywords:

empathy, pro-social behavior, faculty collaboration, assessment of higher education, public university

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between empathy, prosocial behavior, and collaboration among professors on a public university campus in the countryside of Minas Gerais, Brazil, seeking to grasp how these subjective dimensions support collective practices in institutional contexts marked by structural constraints. Using a theoretical-empirical approach, this study deals with contemporary literature on empathy, reciprocity, and organizational environment, interconnecting it to the reality of a small campus with strong regional insertion. Methodologically, a mixed-methods research strategy has been adopted, combining a structured questionnaire with Likert-type scales and open-ended questions, applied to 15 out of the 17 eligible professors on the campus (response rate of 88.2%), whose data were examined by using descriptive statistics and categorical content analysis. The results highlight the presence of a robust collaborative culture, anchored primarily in interpersonal bonds, affinities, and shared values, while also revealing persistent barriers such as work overload, lack of time, and insufficient institutionalization of mutual support practices. It is concluded that empathy, in its affective and cognitive dimensions, works as a resilience factor and compensatory mechanism in face of organizational weaknesses, contributing to the maintenance of faculty engagement and the quality of academic activities. This study provides means for the design of institutional policies aimed at strengthening cooperation among peers, appreciating socio-emotional skills, and building healthier, more inclusive university environments that are consistent with the public mission of Higher Education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: toward a social-psychological answer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.

Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516 - 1530.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto (3ª ed.). Artmed.

Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 282 - 306). Oxford University Press.

Davis, M. H., Luce, C., & Kraus, S. J. (1994). The heritability of characteristics associated with dispositional empathy. Journal of Personality, 62(3), 369-391.

Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665 - 697.

Flick, U. (2009). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa (3ª ed.). Artmed.

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.

Prefeitura Municipal de Campanha. (n.d.). O município. Campanha. <https://www.campanha.mg.gov.br/index.php/o-municipio>

Resolução n. 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. (2012). Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília, DF. <https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html>

Santos, R. V., Oliveira, A. L., Souza, M. C., & Silva, F. R. (2023). Empatia e relações interpessoais no contexto universitário brasileiro. Estudos de Psicologia, 40(2), 10 - 18.

Silke, A., Dempsey, M., & Kelly, J. G. (2024). Empathy education programs for higher education: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, (9).

Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais. (n. d.). História do campus Campanha. UEMG. <https://www.uemg.br/institucional-campanha/historia>

University of Cambridge. (2024). One term of empathy training measurably improved classroom behaviour. Cambridge Research News. <https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/one-term-of-empathy-training-measurably-improved-classroom-behaviour>

Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Towards tolerance: representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31 - 47.

Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 116 - 132.

Yin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Is empathy associated with more prosocial behaviour? A meta‐analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43 - 61.

Published

2026-05-04

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Collaboration, empathy, and prosociality among professors: un análisis en el contexto de la UEMG Campanha. (2026). Conhecer: Debate Entre O Público E O Privado, 16(35), e163504. https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2026.16.35.17115