Ciencia crítica autocrítica

la mejor validez relativa, por el momento...

Autores/as

  • Pedro Demo Professor Emérito da Universidade de Brasília – UnB e Pesquisador de Produtividade 1B do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq
  • Renan Antônio da Silva Professor na Universidade Estadual do Ceará – UECE e Bolsista da Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – FUNCAP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2021.11.27.5606

Palabras clave:

educación, ciencia crítica, estudiantes

Resumen

La lectura y el estudio del libro de James C. Scott Seeing like a State: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed ha demostrado ser una gran fuente de aprendizaje concreto de las limitaciones de la intervención científica lineal, secuencial, matemática y/o algorítmica. Recordemos que el acrónimo STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) se utiliza casi como un imperativo escolar para el éxito productivo y competitivo, siendo estrictamente seguido en las escuelas asiáticas, especialmente las chinas, que actualmente ocupan el primer puesto en el Programa Internacional para la Evaluación de Estudiantes (Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA]) en términos de lectura, ciencias y matemáticas y defienden la gloria del llamado instruccionalismo global. Varios autores reflejan no solo argumentos pedagógicos pertinentes, sino su propia experiencia: la pedagogía china, por ejemplo, demuestra ser opresiva, domesticadora, brutal y lleva a muchos estudiantes a la desesperación, especialmente cuando se enfrentan a las matemáticas e ignoran que el aprendizaje es un proceso natural y evolutivo y rara profundidad autoral e integral, implica el bienestar físico y mental de los estudiantes

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adorno, T., Habermas, J., & Popper, K. R. (1972). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie.

Berlin, Deutschland: Luchterhand.

Althusser, L. (1971). La revolución teórica de Marx. México, DF: Siglo XXI.

Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Para leer El Capital. México, DF: Siglo XXI.

Anne, T. (2009). Critical reasoning: a practical introduction. London, UK: T & F.

Bacich, L., & Moran, J. (Orgs.). (2018). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora. Porto

Alegre, RS: Penso.

Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: the professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and

active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bellah, R. N. (2011). Religion in human evolution: from the Paleolithic to the axial age. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Blum, S. D. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Boylan, M. (2009). Critical inquiry. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Broad, W. J. & Wade, N. (1983). Betrayers of the truth: fraud and deceit in the halls of sciences. New

York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critical reflective teacher. London, UK: Jossey Bass.

Brookfield, S. D. (2011). Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question

their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Buonomano, D. (2011). Brain bugs: how the brain’s flaws shape our lives. New York, NY: W. W.

Norton & Co.

Calazans, J. (Org.). (1999). Iniciação científica: construindo o pensamento crítico. São Paulo, SP:

Cortez.

Carroll, R. T. (2004). Becoming a critical thinker: a guide for the new millennium. New York, NY:

Pearson Custom.

PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA

Cass Sunstein. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein

Chevassus-au-Louis, N., & Elliott, N. (2019). Fraud in the lab: the high stakes of scientific research.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Coelho, E. C. (1988). A sinecura acadêmica: a ética universitária em questão. Rio de Janeiro, RJ:

Vértice.

Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 5 de outubro de 1988. (1988). Brasília, DF.

Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic circles: fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high

school. Portland, OR: Stennhouse.

C. P. Snow. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._P._Snow

Cribb, J., & Sari, T. (2010). Open science: sharing knowledge in the global century. New York, NY:

Cairo.

Darder, A., Baltodano, M. P., & Torres, R. D. (Eds.). (2009). The critical pedagogy reader. London, UK:

Routledge.

Davies, P. (2019). The demon in the machine. London, UK: Penguin.

Deacon, T. W. (2012). Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter. New York, NY: W. W.

Norton & Co.

Demo, P. (1995). Metodologia científica em ciências sociais. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.

Demo, P. (2001). Pesquisa e informação qualitativa. Campinas, SP: Papirus.

Demo, P. (2002). Complexidade e aprendizagem: a dinâmica não linear do conhecimento. São Paulo,

SP: Atlas.

Demo, P. (2007). Pobreza política: a pobreza mais intensa da pobreza brasileira. Campinas, SP:

Autores Associados.

Demo, P. (2011a). A força sem força do melhor argumento: ensaio sobre “novas epistemologias

virtuais”. Brasília, DF: Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia.

Demo, P. (2011b). Forças e fraquezas do positivismo. Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/

d/1YywWOJ0xRWzJy3ty0WfqvkvlFyoKEtBd/view

Demo, P. (2012). Ciência rebelde: para continuar aprendendo, cumpre desestruturar-se. São Paulo,

SP: Atlas.

Demo, P. (2015). Aprender como autor. São Paulo, SP: GEN.

Demo, P. (2016). Politicidade da matemática. Recuperado de https://docs.google.com/document/

d/1yNscG9fM6B6FS5R1raWsF1f_dnI8lzNhUjjBuD2g-tI/pub

Demo, P. (2018). Atividades de aprendizagem: sair da mania do ensino para comprometer-se com a

aprendizagem do estudante. Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FKskDCxNB422

PVhrjrDjD48S4cjsb77-/view

CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 33

Demo, P. (2019). Direitos humanos supremacistas à brasileira: de como fabricar cidadanias privilegiadas.

Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q9IkToL5jPHSSfEXbJa8DAy8n-KWORjM/view

Demo, P. (2020a). Educação devastada: um sistema de ensino caduco, fraudulento, injusto.

Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2021/02/ensaio-620-educacao-devastada-um.

html

Demo, P. (2020b). Sucesso educacional em questão: supremacia asiática educacional contestada.

Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/08/ensaio-532-sucesso-educacional-

-em_25.html

Demo, P. (2020c). Marx não foi marxista. Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/12/

ensaio-555-marx-nao-foi-marxista.html

Demo, P. (2020d). Educação à deriva: à direita e à esquerda - instrucionismo como patrimônio nacional.

Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/05/ensaio-512-educacao-deriva-direita-e.

html

Deresiewicz, W. (2014). Excellent sheep: the miseducation of the American elite & the way to a

meaningful life. New York, NY: Free Press.

Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: how societies choose to fall or succeed. New York, NY: Viking.

Diamond, J. (2012). The world until yesterday: what can we learn from traditional societies? New York,

NY: Penguin Books.

Dintersmith, T. (2018). What school could be: insights and inspiration from teachers across America.

Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Disinformation. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation

Dupas, G. (2006). O mito do progresso. São Paulo, SP: Ed. UNESP.

Dyson, F. (2006). The scientist as rebel. New York, NY: New York Review Books.

Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness: how matter becomes imagination.

New York, NY: Basic Books.

Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life.

London, UK: Prentice Hall.

Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Cambridge,

MA: Blackwell.

Feldman, N. (2020). The Arab winter: a tragedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Foerster, H., & Poerksen, B. (2008). Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners: Gespräche für

Skeptiker. Berlin, Deutschland: Carl-Auer-Systeme.

Foucault, M. (1971). A arqueologia do saber. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.

Foucault, M. (2000). A ordem do discurso. São Paulo, SP: Loyola.

PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA

Frasca, G. (2001). Videogames of the oppressed: videogames as a means for critical thinking and

debate. Recuperado de http://www.ludology.org/articles/thesis/FrascaThesisVideogames.pdf

Gelernter, D. (2016). The tides of mind: uncovering the spectrum of consciousness. New York, NY:

Liveright.

Giberson, K., & Artigas, M. (2007). Oracles of science: celebrity scientists versus God and religion.

Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Haber, J. (2020). Critical thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Habermas, J. (1989). Consciência moral e agir comunicativo. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Tempo Brasileiro.

Hahn, H., Neurath, O., & Carnap, R. (2001). The scientific conception of the world: the Vienna circle. In

F. Stadler, The Vienna Circle: studies in the origins, development, and influence of logical empiricism

(pp. 334-339). Wien, Österreich: Universität Wien.

Halpern, D. F. (2009). Thought & knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. London, UK:

Psychology.

Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: a brief history of humankind. New York, NY: Harper Perennial

Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo deus: a brief history of tomorrow. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lessons for the 21st century. New York, NY: Spiegel and Grau.

Hawking, S. W. (2006). The Theory of Everything: the origin and fate of the universe. Beverly Hills,

CA: Phoenix.

Hecht, J. M. (2003). Doubt: a history – the great doubters, their legacy of innovation from Socrates

and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. New York , NY: Harper.

Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The human advantage: a new understanding of how our brain became

remarkable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Holton, G. (1996). Einstein, history, and other passions. The rebellion against science at the end of the

th century. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154870412.pdf

Hooks, B. (2009). Teaching critical thinking: practical wisdom. London, UK: T & F.

Horgan, J. (1997). The end of science: facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific

age. New York, NY: Broadway.

Horgan, J. (2002). A mente desconhecida: por que a ciência não consegue replicar, medicar e explicar

o cérebro humano. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Hudson, M. (2019). Extinction Rebellion’s commuter and science critics are missing the point.

Recuperado de https://theconversation.com/extinction-rebellions-commuter-and-science critics-are-missing-the-point-125402

Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding: and other writings. Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press.

CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 35

Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: how a group of hackers, geniuses, and geeks created the digital

revolution. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Jones, S. (Ed.). (1999). Doing internet research: critical issue and methods for examining the net.

Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Jones, P., Judge, B., & Mccreery, E. (2009). Critical thinking skills for education students. New York,

NY: Learning Matters.

Kanecki, D. (2009). Critical thinking and the philosophy of knowledge. Whitmore, CA: Kaneck.

Kauffman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: the emergence and evolution of life. Oxford, UK:

Oxford University Press.

Kemp, G. (2009). Critical thinking: a concise guide. London, UK: T & F.

King, S. J. (2020). The Arab winter: democratic consolidation, civil war, and radical Islamists.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Klein, N. (2009). London No Logo. Picador. Harper Perennial

Klein, N. (2010). The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan.

Klein, N. (2013). Naomi Klein: how science is telling us all to revolt. Recuperado de

https://www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/science-says-revolt

Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: why consciousness is widespread but can’t be computed.

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1975). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo, SP: Perspectiva.

Kurzban, R. (2010). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: evolution and the modular mind. Princeton,

NJ: Princeton University Press.

Landow, G. P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: critical theory and new media in an era of globalization.

Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Laszlo, E., Laszlo, A., Chopra, D., & Grof, S. (2016). What is reality? The new map of cosmos,

consciousness, and existence. New York, NY: SelectBooks.

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Latour, B. (2000). Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo,

SP: Ed. UNESP.

Latour, B. (2001). A esperança de Pandora. São Paulo, SP: EDUSC.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK:

Oxford University Press.

PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA

Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: eight lectures on the new climate regime. Oxford, UK: Oxford

University Press.

Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Lents, N. (2018). Human errors: a panorama of our glitches, from pointless bones to broken genes.

New York, NY: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

Marx, K. (1973a). Contribuição para a crítica da economia política. Lisboa, Portugal: Estampa.

Marx, K. (1973b). The Grundrisse. New York, NY: Peter Smith.

Maturana, H. (2001). Cognição, ciência e vida cotidiana. , Belo Horizonte, MG: Ed. UFMG.

McCreery, E. (2010). Critical thinking skills for education students. London, UK: Learning Matters.

Mcintyre, L. (2019). The scientific attitude: defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience.

Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Megill, D. (2008). The critical in critical thinking: an essay. [n.l.]: eMegill.

Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and

emancipatory learning. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Monroe, K. R. (Ed.). (2005). Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven, CT:

Yale University Press.

Moon, J. (2009). Critical thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London, UK: T & F.

Moore, B. N. (2008). Critical thinking. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.

Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: why the materialistic neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost

certainly false. New York, NY: Audible Studios.

Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton

University Press.

Noddings, N. (2006). Critical lessons: what our schools should teach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Pacchioni, G. (2018). The overproduction of truth: passion, competition, and integrity in modern

science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Panek, R. (2011). The 4 percent universe: dark matter, dark energy, and the race to discover the rest of

reality. Wilmington, DE: Mariner.

CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 37

Parker, L., & Welch, C. (2017). 3 things you need to know about the science rebellion against Trump.

Recuperado de https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2017/01/scientists-march-on washington-national-parks-twitter-war-climate-science-donald-trump/

Pearse, M., & Walton, K. M. (2011). Teaching numeracy: 9 critical habits to ignite mathematical thinking.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: the case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New

York, NY: Viking.

Poerksen, B. (2004). The certainty of uncertainty: dialogues introducing constructivism. London, UK:

Imprint Academic.

Popkewitz, T. S. (2001). Lutando em defesa da alma: a política do ensino e a construção do professor.

Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London, UK: Hutchinson.

Popper, K. R. (1967). El desarrollo del conocimiento científico: conjeturas y refutaciones. Buenos

Aires, Argentina: Paidós.

Posner, R. A. (2007). The little book of plagiarism. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Prashad, V. (2012). Arab Spring, Libyan winter. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Rescher, N. (1987) Forbidden Knowledge and Other Essays on the Philosophy of Cognition, D.

Reidel, Dortdecht, Holland.

Ripley, A. (2013). The smartest kids in the world: and how they got that way. New York, NY: Simon

& Schuster.

Rovelli, C. (2011). The first scientist: Anaximander and his legacy. Yardley, PA: Westholme.

Rovelli, C. (2014). Science is rebellion: knowledge relies on throwing out what we think. Recuperado

de https://iai.tv/articles/science-is-rebellion-auid-455

Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or be programmed. New York, NY: OR.

Sahlberg, P. (2017). FinishED leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: what’s become of the common good? New York, NY:

Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.

Schmidt-Salomon, M. (2005). “Ich weiss nur dies, dass ich kein Marxist bin...”: Karl Marx und die

Marxismen – Aufklärung und Kritik. Recuperado de http://www.schmidt-salomon.de/marxismen.pdf

Scott, J. (2020). Seeing like a State: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have

failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Shattuck, R. (1996) Forbidden Knowledge, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA

Shermer, M. (2018). Heavens on Earth: the scientific search for the afterlife, immortality, and utopia.

New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.

Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Socratic method. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method

Spengler, O. (1991). The decline of the West. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Spiller, N. (Ed.). (2002). Cyber reader: critical writings for the digital era. London, UK: Phaidon.

Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: how many minds produce knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford

University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide. Oxford, UK: Oxford

University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The world according to Star Wars. New York, NY: Dey Street.

Sunstein, C.R. (2017a). #Republic: divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017b). Impeachment: a citizen’s guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2019a). Conformity: the power of social influences. New York, NY: New York

University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2019b). How change happens. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2019c). On freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2020a). Too much information: understanding what you don’t know. Cambridge, MA:

The MIT Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2020b). Law and Leviathan: redeeming the administrative State. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence. New York, NY: Knopf.

Terra. (2019). Entenda a polêmica envolvendo bolsonaro e o INPE. Dado sobre desmatamento da

Amazônia provocou demissão de diretor. Recuperado de https://www.terra.com.br/noticias/

brasil/entenda-a-polemica-envolvendo-bolsonaro-e-o-inpe,f7e27aa4a276cd32e59978704d 2794194z00o4g1.html

Todos pela Educação. (2020). Anuário Brasileiro da Educação Básica 2020. Recuperado de https://

todospelaeducacao.org.br/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2020/10/Anuario-Brasileiro-

-Educacao-Basica-2020-web-outubro.pdf

CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 39

Unger, R. M., & Smolin, L. (2014). The singular universe and the reality of time: a proposal in natural

philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: the making of young people who will change the world. New

York, NY: Scribner.

Warnick, B. (2002). Critical literacy in a digital era: technology, rhetoric, and the public interest.

London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Weinberg, S. (1977). The search for unity: notes for a history of quantum field theory. Daedalus,

(4), 17-35.

Williams, M. (2001). Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford, UK:

Oxford University Press.

Wootton, D. (2015). The invention of science: a new history of the scientific revolution. New York, NY:

HaperCollins.

Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Zhao, Y. (2014). Who is afraid of the big bad dragon: why China has the best (and the worst)

education system in the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Zhao, Y. (2016). Counting what counts: reframing education outcomes. Bloomington, IN: Solution

Tree.

Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: side effects in education. New York NY: Teachers College Press.

Zhao, Y., Emler, T. E., Snethen, A., & Yin, D. (2019). An education crisis is a terrible thing to waste: how

radical changes can spark student excitement and success. New York NY: Teachers College Press.

Publicado

2021-10-18

Cómo citar

Demo, P., & Silva, R. A. da . (2021). Ciencia crítica autocrítica: la mejor validez relativa, por el momento. Conhecer: Debate Entre O Público E O Privado, 11(27), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2021.11.27.5606

Número

Sección

Artigos