Ciência crítica autocrítica
validade relativa que melhor vale, por enquanto...
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2021.11.27.5606Palavras-chave:
educação, ciência crítica, estudantesResumo
Recordemos que a sigla STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) vale quase como comando escolar para o sucesso produtivo e competitivo, sendo seguido à risca em escolas asiáticas, sobretudo as chinesas, que hoje ocupam o primeiro lugar no Programa Internacional de Avaliação de Alunos (Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA]) em leitura, ciência e matemática e fazem a glória do chamado instrucionismo global. Tal “pedagogia” sempre foi contestada, embora hoje reine soberana na indústria global da educação, atrelada ao mercado liberal. Diversos autores refletem não só pertinentes argumentações pedagógicas, mas experiência própria: a pedagogia chinesa, como exemplo, se mostra opressiva, domesticadora, brutal e leva muitos estudantes ao desespero - principalmente diante da matemática e ignorando que a aprendizagem, um processo evolucionário natural e de rara profundidade autoral e integral, implica o bem-estar físico e mental dos estudantes.
Downloads
Referências
Adorno, T., Habermas, J., & Popper, K. R. (1972). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie.
Berlin, Deutschland: Luchterhand.
Althusser, L. (1971). La revolución teórica de Marx. México, DF: Siglo XXI.
Althusser, L., & Balibar, E. (1970). Para leer El Capital. México, DF: Siglo XXI.
Anne, T. (2009). Critical reasoning: a practical introduction. London, UK: T & F.
Bacich, L., & Moran, J. (Orgs.). (2018). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora. Porto
Alegre, RS: Penso.
Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: the professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and
active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bellah, R. N. (2011). Religion in human evolution: from the Paleolithic to the axial age. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Blum, S. D. (2009). My word! Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Boylan, M. (2009). Critical inquiry. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Broad, W. J. & Wade, N. (1983). Betrayers of the truth: fraud and deceit in the halls of sciences. New
York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critical reflective teacher. London, UK: Jossey Bass.
Brookfield, S. D. (2011). Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question
their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Buonomano, D. (2011). Brain bugs: how the brain’s flaws shape our lives. New York, NY: W. W.
Norton & Co.
Calazans, J. (Org.). (1999). Iniciação científica: construindo o pensamento crítico. São Paulo, SP:
Cortez.
Carroll, R. T. (2004). Becoming a critical thinker: a guide for the new millennium. New York, NY:
Pearson Custom.
PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA
Cass Sunstein. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein
Chevassus-au-Louis, N., & Elliott, N. (2019). Fraud in the lab: the high stakes of scientific research.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coelho, E. C. (1988). A sinecura acadêmica: a ética universitária em questão. Rio de Janeiro, RJ:
Vértice.
Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, de 5 de outubro de 1988. (1988). Brasília, DF.
Copeland, M. (2005). Socratic circles: fostering critical and creative thinking in middle and high
school. Portland, OR: Stennhouse.
C. P. Snow. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._P._Snow
Cribb, J., & Sari, T. (2010). Open science: sharing knowledge in the global century. New York, NY:
Cairo.
Darder, A., Baltodano, M. P., & Torres, R. D. (Eds.). (2009). The critical pedagogy reader. London, UK:
Routledge.
Davies, P. (2019). The demon in the machine. London, UK: Penguin.
Deacon, T. W. (2012). Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter. New York, NY: W. W.
Norton & Co.
Demo, P. (1995). Metodologia científica em ciências sociais. São Paulo, SP: Atlas.
Demo, P. (2001). Pesquisa e informação qualitativa. Campinas, SP: Papirus.
Demo, P. (2002). Complexidade e aprendizagem: a dinâmica não linear do conhecimento. São Paulo,
SP: Atlas.
Demo, P. (2007). Pobreza política: a pobreza mais intensa da pobreza brasileira. Campinas, SP:
Autores Associados.
Demo, P. (2011a). A força sem força do melhor argumento: ensaio sobre “novas epistemologias
virtuais”. Brasília, DF: Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia.
Demo, P. (2011b). Forças e fraquezas do positivismo. Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/
d/1YywWOJ0xRWzJy3ty0WfqvkvlFyoKEtBd/view
Demo, P. (2012). Ciência rebelde: para continuar aprendendo, cumpre desestruturar-se. São Paulo,
SP: Atlas.
Demo, P. (2015). Aprender como autor. São Paulo, SP: GEN.
Demo, P. (2016). Politicidade da matemática. Recuperado de https://docs.google.com/document/
d/1yNscG9fM6B6FS5R1raWsF1f_dnI8lzNhUjjBuD2g-tI/pub
Demo, P. (2018). Atividades de aprendizagem: sair da mania do ensino para comprometer-se com a
aprendizagem do estudante. Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FKskDCxNB422
PVhrjrDjD48S4cjsb77-/view
CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 33
Demo, P. (2019). Direitos humanos supremacistas à brasileira: de como fabricar cidadanias privilegiadas.
Recuperado de https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q9IkToL5jPHSSfEXbJa8DAy8n-KWORjM/view
Demo, P. (2020a). Educação devastada: um sistema de ensino caduco, fraudulento, injusto.
Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2021/02/ensaio-620-educacao-devastada-um.
html
Demo, P. (2020b). Sucesso educacional em questão: supremacia asiática educacional contestada.
Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/08/ensaio-532-sucesso-educacional-
-em_25.html
Demo, P. (2020c). Marx não foi marxista. Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/12/
ensaio-555-marx-nao-foi-marxista.html
Demo, P. (2020d). Educação à deriva: à direita e à esquerda - instrucionismo como patrimônio nacional.
Recuperado de https://pedrodemo.blogspot.com/2020/05/ensaio-512-educacao-deriva-direita-e.
html
Deresiewicz, W. (2014). Excellent sheep: the miseducation of the American elite & the way to a
meaningful life. New York, NY: Free Press.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: how societies choose to fall or succeed. New York, NY: Viking.
Diamond, J. (2012). The world until yesterday: what can we learn from traditional societies? New York,
NY: Penguin Books.
Dintersmith, T. (2018). What school could be: insights and inspiration from teachers across America.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Disinformation. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation
Dupas, G. (2006). O mito do progresso. São Paulo, SP: Ed. UNESP.
Dyson, F. (2006). The scientist as rebel. New York, NY: New York Review Books.
Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness: how matter becomes imagination.
New York, NY: Basic Books.
Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life.
London, UK: Prentice Hall.
Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Cambridge,
MA: Blackwell.
Feldman, N. (2020). The Arab winter: a tragedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Foerster, H., & Poerksen, B. (2008). Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners: Gespräche für
Skeptiker. Berlin, Deutschland: Carl-Auer-Systeme.
Foucault, M. (1971). A arqueologia do saber. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Foucault, M. (2000). A ordem do discurso. São Paulo, SP: Loyola.
PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA
Frasca, G. (2001). Videogames of the oppressed: videogames as a means for critical thinking and
debate. Recuperado de http://www.ludology.org/articles/thesis/FrascaThesisVideogames.pdf
Gelernter, D. (2016). The tides of mind: uncovering the spectrum of consciousness. New York, NY:
Liveright.
Giberson, K., & Artigas, M. (2007). Oracles of science: celebrity scientists versus God and religion.
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Haber, J. (2020). Critical thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). Consciência moral e agir comunicativo. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Tempo Brasileiro.
Hahn, H., Neurath, O., & Carnap, R. (2001). The scientific conception of the world: the Vienna circle. In
F. Stadler, The Vienna Circle: studies in the origins, development, and influence of logical empiricism
(pp. 334-339). Wien, Österreich: Universität Wien.
Halpern, D. F. (2009). Thought & knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking. London, UK:
Psychology.
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: a brief history of humankind. New York, NY: Harper Perennial
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Homo deus: a brief history of tomorrow. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 lessons for the 21st century. New York, NY: Spiegel and Grau.
Hawking, S. W. (2006). The Theory of Everything: the origin and fate of the universe. Beverly Hills,
CA: Phoenix.
Hecht, J. M. (2003). Doubt: a history – the great doubters, their legacy of innovation from Socrates
and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. New York , NY: Harper.
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2016). The human advantage: a new understanding of how our brain became
remarkable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Holton, G. (1996). Einstein, history, and other passions. The rebellion against science at the end of the
th century. Recuperado de https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/154870412.pdf
Hooks, B. (2009). Teaching critical thinking: practical wisdom. London, UK: T & F.
Horgan, J. (1997). The end of science: facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific
age. New York, NY: Broadway.
Horgan, J. (2002). A mente desconhecida: por que a ciência não consegue replicar, medicar e explicar
o cérebro humano. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.
Hudson, M. (2019). Extinction Rebellion’s commuter and science critics are missing the point.
Recuperado de https://theconversation.com/extinction-rebellions-commuter-and-science critics-are-missing-the-point-125402
Hume, D. (2007). An enquiry concerning human understanding: and other writings. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 35
Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: how a group of hackers, geniuses, and geeks created the digital
revolution. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Jones, S. (Ed.). (1999). Doing internet research: critical issue and methods for examining the net.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Jones, P., Judge, B., & Mccreery, E. (2009). Critical thinking skills for education students. New York,
NY: Learning Matters.
Kanecki, D. (2009). Critical thinking and the philosophy of knowledge. Whitmore, CA: Kaneck.
Kauffman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: the emergence and evolution of life. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Kemp, G. (2009). Critical thinking: a concise guide. London, UK: T & F.
King, S. J. (2020). The Arab winter: democratic consolidation, civil war, and radical Islamists.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, N. (2009). London No Logo. Picador. Harper Perennial
Klein, N. (2010). The shock doctrine: the rise of disaster capitalism. New York, NY: Metropolitan.
Klein, N. (2013). Naomi Klein: how science is telling us all to revolt. Recuperado de
https://www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/science-says-revolt
Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: why consciousness is widespread but can’t be computed.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1975). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo, SP: Perspectiva.
Kurzban, R. (2010). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: evolution and the modular mind. Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Landow, G. P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: critical theory and new media in an era of globalization.
Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laszlo, E., Laszlo, A., Chopra, D., & Grof, S. (2016). What is reality? The new map of cosmos,
consciousness, and existence. New York, NY: SelectBooks.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Latour, B. (2000). Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo,
SP: Ed. UNESP.
Latour, B. (2001). A esperança de Pandora. São Paulo, SP: EDUSC.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA
Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: eight lectures on the new climate regime. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Lents, N. (2018). Human errors: a panorama of our glitches, from pointless bones to broken genes.
New York, NY: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Marx, K. (1973a). Contribuição para a crítica da economia política. Lisboa, Portugal: Estampa.
Marx, K. (1973b). The Grundrisse. New York, NY: Peter Smith.
Maturana, H. (2001). Cognição, ciência e vida cotidiana. , Belo Horizonte, MG: Ed. UFMG.
McCreery, E. (2010). Critical thinking skills for education students. London, UK: Learning Matters.
Mcintyre, L. (2019). The scientific attitude: defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience.
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Megill, D. (2008). The critical in critical thinking: an essay. [n.l.]: eMegill.
Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and
emancipatory learning. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Monroe, K. R. (Ed.). (2005). Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Moon, J. (2009). Critical thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London, UK: T & F.
Moore, B. N. (2008). Critical thinking. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
Nagel, T. (2012). Mind and cosmos: why the materialistic neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost
certainly false. New York, NY: Audible Studios.
Nielsen, M. (2012). Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Noddings, N. (2006). Critical lessons: what our schools should teach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Pacchioni, G. (2018). The overproduction of truth: passion, competition, and integrity in modern
science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Panek, R. (2011). The 4 percent universe: dark matter, dark energy, and the race to discover the rest of
reality. Wilmington, DE: Mariner.
CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 37
Parker, L., & Welch, C. (2017). 3 things you need to know about the science rebellion against Trump.
Recuperado de https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2017/01/scientists-march-on washington-national-parks-twitter-war-climate-science-donald-trump/
Pearse, M., & Walton, K. M. (2011). Teaching numeracy: 9 critical habits to ignite mathematical thinking.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: the case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New
York, NY: Viking.
Poerksen, B. (2004). The certainty of uncertainty: dialogues introducing constructivism. London, UK:
Imprint Academic.
Popkewitz, T. S. (2001). Lutando em defesa da alma: a política do ensino e a construção do professor.
Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. R. (1967). El desarrollo del conocimiento científico: conjeturas y refutaciones. Buenos
Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Posner, R. A. (2007). The little book of plagiarism. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Prashad, V. (2012). Arab Spring, Libyan winter. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Rescher, N. (1987) Forbidden Knowledge and Other Essays on the Philosophy of Cognition, D.
Reidel, Dortdecht, Holland.
Ripley, A. (2013). The smartest kids in the world: and how they got that way. New York, NY: Simon
& Schuster.
Rovelli, C. (2011). The first scientist: Anaximander and his legacy. Yardley, PA: Westholme.
Rovelli, C. (2014). Science is rebellion: knowledge relies on throwing out what we think. Recuperado
de https://iai.tv/articles/science-is-rebellion-auid-455
Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or be programmed. New York, NY: OR.
Sahlberg, P. (2017). FinishED leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: what’s become of the common good? New York, NY:
Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
Schmidt-Salomon, M. (2005). “Ich weiss nur dies, dass ich kein Marxist bin...”: Karl Marx und die
Marxismen – Aufklärung und Kritik. Recuperado de http://www.schmidt-salomon.de/marxismen.pdf
Scott, J. (2020). Seeing like a State: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have
failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shattuck, R. (1996) Forbidden Knowledge, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
PEDRO DEMO/ RENAN ANTÔNIO DA SILVA
Shermer, M. (2018). Heavens on Earth: the scientific search for the afterlife, immortality, and utopia.
New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Socratic method. (n.d.). Recuperado de https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
Spengler, O. (1991). The decline of the West. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Spiller, N. (Ed.). (2002). Cyber reader: critical writings for the digital era. London, UK: Phaidon.
Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: how many minds produce knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The world according to Star Wars. New York, NY: Dey Street.
Sunstein, C.R. (2017a). #Republic: divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017b). Impeachment: a citizen’s guide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2019a). Conformity: the power of social influences. New York, NY: New York
University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2019b). How change happens. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2019c). On freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2020a). Too much information: understanding what you don’t know. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2020b). Law and Leviathan: redeeming the administrative State. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: being human in the age of artificial intelligence. New York, NY: Knopf.
Terra. (2019). Entenda a polêmica envolvendo bolsonaro e o INPE. Dado sobre desmatamento da
Amazônia provocou demissão de diretor. Recuperado de https://www.terra.com.br/noticias/
brasil/entenda-a-polemica-envolvendo-bolsonaro-e-o-inpe,f7e27aa4a276cd32e59978704d 2794194z00o4g1.html
Todos pela Educação. (2020). Anuário Brasileiro da Educação Básica 2020. Recuperado de https://
todospelaeducacao.org.br/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2020/10/Anuario-Brasileiro-
-Educacao-Basica-2020-web-outubro.pdf
CONHECER: DEBATE ENTRE O PÚBLICO E O PRIVADO. V. 11 Nº 27/2021.2 39
Unger, R. M., & Smolin, L. (2014). The singular universe and the reality of time: a proposal in natural
philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, T. (2012). Creating innovators: the making of young people who will change the world. New
York, NY: Scribner.
Warnick, B. (2002). Critical literacy in a digital era: technology, rhetoric, and the public interest.
London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Weinberg, S. (1977). The search for unity: notes for a history of quantum field theory. Daedalus,
(4), 17-35.
Williams, M. (2001). Problems of knowledge: a critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Wootton, D. (2015). The invention of science: a new history of the scientific revolution. New York, NY:
HaperCollins.
Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Zhao, Y. (2014). Who is afraid of the big bad dragon: why China has the best (and the worst)
education system in the world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zhao, Y. (2016). Counting what counts: reframing education outcomes. Bloomington, IN: Solution
Tree.
Zhao, Y. (2018). What works may hurt: side effects in education. New York NY: Teachers College Press.
Zhao, Y., Emler, T. E., Snethen, A., & Yin, D. (2019). An education crisis is a terrible thing to waste: how
radical changes can spark student excitement and success. New York NY: Teachers College Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
