Comparison between halal and conventional cattle slaughter in an islamic and zootechnical view

Authors

  • James Eduard Campos e Sant anna Conveying Islamic Message Society (CIMS)
  • Yunus Mustafa Al Sheikh Conveying Islamic Message Society (CIMS)
  • Anselmo José Spadotto Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)

Keywords:

Animal, suffering, stunning, religion, slaughter, cattle

Abstract

Among the cattle meat production systems, the halal system is the one accepted by the Muslim community spread in several countries, representing millions of people. The conventional system, as understood in this research, is one that involves zootechnical aspects, in short, productive efficiency. The hypothesis of this research was based on the position that halal slaughter constitutes a superior practice to conventional slaughter. What would it mean, if this “superiority” of halal slaughter over conventional slaughter was confirmed, that it is more humanized and efficient. The main research was classified as qualitative, and it developed between april 2020 and february2021. As a result, it was found that the view of being bovine slaughter only the stages of stunning and bleeding (or sticking) limits the analysis in the comparison between conventional and halal slaughter. It was concluded, therefore, that the slaughter is a long process that begins with the loading of the animal on the farm, therefore, it is necessary broader and deeper studies with analyzes of the ethological and biochemical indicators of animal stress in the stages of slaughter here explaned, to produce a safer and more precise opinion as to which form of slaughter, halal or conventional, is less stressful for cattle.

References

ABDULLAH, F.A.; BORILOVA G.; STEINHAUSEROVA, I. Halal criteria versus conventional slaughter technology. Animals, v.9, p.530, 2019.

AGHWAN, Z.A.; BELLO, A.U.; ABUBAKAR, A.A.; IMLAN, J.C.; SAZILI, A.Q. Efficient halal bleeding, animal handling, and welfare: A holistic approach for meat quality. Meat Science,v.121, p.420-428, 2016. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27468102/. Acesso em: 21 de dezembro de 2020.

AL ABBADI, A.A.R. Zabiha keehkam o masail (Rules and regulations on slaughtering). Islamic Research Institute, Islamic International Lahore University,Islamabad – Pakistan, 1988. Disponível em https://ifancahalal.pk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Halal-and-humane-slaughter-Halal-Focus.pdf. Acesso em: 21 de dezembro de 2020.

ANIL, M.H. Religious slaughter: A current controversial animal welfare issue. Animal Frontiers, v.2, n.3, p.64-67, 2012.

AWAN, J.A.: SOHAIB, M.Halal and human slaughter; comparison between islamic teachings and modern methods. Pakistan Journal of Food Sciences,v.26, n.4, p.234-240, 2016.

BENZERTIHA, A.; KIERINCZYK, B.; RAWSKI, M.; JOZEFIAK, A.; MAZURKIEWICZ, J.; JOZEFIAK, D.; MESSIKH, M.S.; SWIATKIEWICZ, S. Cultural and practical aspects of halal slaughtering in food production. MedycynaWeterynaryjna, v.74, n.6, p.371-376,2018.

DJAKELI, K.; MAHDI, Y. Halal market for food production. Journal of Social Sciences, v.3, n.1. p.11-18, 2014.

EUROPA. European food safety authotity. Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing methods, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/45

FUSEINI, A.; KNOWLES, T.G.; HADLEY, P.J.; WOTTON, S.B. Halal stunning and slaughter: Criteria for the assessment of dead animals.Meat Science, v.119, p.132-137, 2016.

GIL, A.C.Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa.5ª ed., São Paulo: Atlas, 2010. 176p.

HAVINGA, T.Regulating halal and kosher foods: different arrangements between state, industry and religious actors.Erasmus Law Review, v.3, n.4.p.241-249, 2010,

ISLAM. Fátua 245.688. Regra sobre a proibição de servir carne de porco a não muçulmanos. Islam Q&A, (Shayich Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid), de 14 de janeiro de 2019. Disponível em: https://islamqa.info/en/answers/245688/it-is-not-permissible-to-buy-pork-and-feed-it-to-non-muslims. Acesso em: 21 de dezembro de 2020.

LAWRIE, R. Ciência da carne.6ª ed., Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2005. 384p.

MARCONI, M.A.; LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 7ª ed., São Paulo: Atlas, 2010. 310p.

MENDES, J. Brasil lidera mercado de carne para muçulmanos, entenda por quê. Jornal O Estado de Minas. 24 de abril de 2018. Disponível em: https://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/ economia/2018/04/24/internas_economia,953748/brasil-lidera-mercado-de-carne-para-muculmanos.shtml Acesso em 06 de dezembro de 2020.

MENDES, P.V.D.C.; SIQUEIRA, H.P.G.; SIQUEIRA, A.B.D.; PRATA, L.F. Cortisol sanguíneo e qualidade da carcaça de frangos abatidos insensibilizados por eletronarcose e método halal. Pubvet, v.13, n.5, p.1-11, 2019.

MENDONÇA, P.S.M.; CAETANO, G.A.D.O. Abate de bovinos: considerações sobre o abate humanitário e jugulação cruenta. Pubvet, v.11, n.12, p.1196-1209, 2017.

MICHEL, M.H. Metodologia e pesquisa científica em ciências sociais. 3ª ed., São Paulo: Atlas, 2015. 304p.

PALMA, C.S.C.; MOREIRA, P.C.; RASSI, L.F.; MAGALHÃES, R.T.D.; WASHCHECK, R.D.C.; DUTRA, A.R.; OLIVEIRA, D.L. Efeitos do tipo de abate na produção de carne bovina. Estudos, Goiânia, v.36, n.5/6, p. 595-609, 2009.

PLEITER, H. Review of stunning and halal slaughter. Meat&Livestock Australia, 2010. 26p. Disponível em:https://www.mla.com.au/contentassets/74517c73509148248a4b0b03d315 0537/ w.liv.0383_final_report.pdf. Acesso em 14 de dezembro de 2020.

RAJA, A. Hungry for halal: analyzing halal certification &policy in the domestic market. UEP 411 Public Policy Practicum Occidental College, Urban & Environmental Policy Professor Cha & Professor Shamasunder May 4, 2018.Disponível em: https://www.oxy.edu/sites/default/files/assets/UEP/Comps/Anissa%20Raja_Hungry%20for%20Halal.pdf. Acesso em 14 de dezembro de 2020.

RAHMAN, S.A. Religion and animal welfare - An Islamic perspective. Animals, v.7, n.2, p.7-11, 2017.

ROÇA, R.O. Modificações post-mortem. Composição Química da Carne. Laboratório de Tecnologia dos Produtos de Origem Animal Fazenda Experimental Lageado, F.C.A. – UNESP. Botucatu: São Paulo, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.fca.unesp.br/Home/ Instituicao/Departamentos/Gestaoetecnologia/Teses/Roca102.pdf. Acesso em: 13 de dezembro de 2020.

ROÇA, R.O. Abate humanitário de bovinos.I Conferência Virtual Global sobre Produção Orgânica de Bovinos de Corte, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/ 255659409_Abate_humanitario_de_bovinos

SEVERINO, A.J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 23ª ed., São Paulo: Cortez, 2007. 274p.

SPADOTTO, A.J. Método Científico Aplicado e Discutido: Teoria e Prática. 1ª ed., Curitiba: Juruá; 2015. 156p.

SPADOTTO, A.J.; SANT ANNA, J.E.C.E. Sustentabilidade e Princípios Ambientais Islâmicos para Realizar Agronegócio.Veredas do Direito, Belo Horizonte, v.17, n.38, p.311-342, 2020.

SHAHDAN, I.A.; REGENSTEIN, J.M.; SHAHABUDDIN, A.S.M.; RAHMAN, M.T. Developing control points for halal slaughtering of poultry. Poultry Science, v.95, n.7, p.1680-1692, 2016.

SHEHADA, H.A.The attitude towards animals in Islam according to Islamic rulings on the internet. Y Net News,25 de março de 2009. Disponível em: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/ 0,7340.L-3688401,00.html Acesso em: 13 de dezembro de 2020.

TANKSON, J.D.; VIZZIER-THAXTON, Y.; THAXTON, J.P.; MAY, J.D.; CAMERON, J.A. Stress and nutritional quality of broilers. Poultry Science, v.80, n.9, p.1384–1389, 2001.

ZAINALABIDIN, M.; GOLNAZ, R.; MAD, N. The Complementary Effect of Halal Principles and Sustainable Concept, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, v.5, n.5, p.652. 2011

ZHANG, L.; YUE, H.Y.; WU, S.G.; XU, L.; ZHANG, H.J.; YAN, H.J.; CAO, Y.L.; GONG, Y.S.; QI, G.H. Transport stress in broilers.II. Superoxide production, adenosine phosphate concentrations,and mRNA levels of avian uncoupling protein, avian adenine nu-cleotide translocator, and avian peroxisome proliferator-activatedreceptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha. Poultry Science, v.89, n.3, p.393–400, 2010.

ZHANG, L.; YUE, H.Y.; ZHANG, H.J.; XU, L.; WU, S.G.; YAN, H.J.; GONG, Y.S.; QI, G.H. Transport stress in broilers: I.Blood metabolism, glycolytic potential, and meat quality. Poultry Science, v.88, n.10, p.2033–2041, 2009.

Published

2022-11-03

How to Cite

SANT ANNA, J. E. C. e .; AL SHEIKH, Y. M.; SPADOTTO, A. J. . Comparison between halal and conventional cattle slaughter in an islamic and zootechnical view. Ciência Animal, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 4, p. 107–117, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/9298. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.