Vol. 30 No. 1 (2020): Revista Ciência Animal
Artigos Originais

Use of 3% DMSO and different glycerol concentrations in the swine semen cooling curve

Ludymila Furtado Cantanhêde
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
Daianny Barboza Guimarães
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
Tatyane Bandeira Barros
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
Aline Viana Dias
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
Lina Raquel Santos Araújo
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias da Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE),
Ricardo Toniolli
Laboratório de Reprodução Suína e Tecnologia de Sêmen (UECE)

Published 2020-12-31

Keywords

  • Cryoprotector agents,
  • freezing,
  • sperm,
  • boar

How to Cite

CANTANHÊDE, L. F.; GUIMARÃES, D. B. .; BARROS, T. B. .; DIAS, A. V.; ARAÚJO, L. R. S. .; TONIOLLI, R. Use of 3% DMSO and different glycerol concentrations in the swine semen cooling curve. Ciência Animal, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 47–63, 2020. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/9651. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to test the cryoprotectant Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-3%) and glycerol, in five concentrations (0.5%, 1%, 3%, 5% and 7%) in a new cooling curve. Seven collections from seven boars (n=49) through the gloved hand technique were made. DMSO (3%) and glycerol were added separately to the freezing diluent. During the analysis of the curve, the lowest mean sperm count was observed at a concentration of 7% glycerol. The concentration of 1% glycerol obtained more sperm motility (72±12.3) but, did not differ in concentrations of 5% glycerol. Higher mean sperm motility and vigor after thawing were observed at 3% glycerol, differing from 0.5% glycerol and 3% DMSO concentrations regarding vigor and other treatments regarding sperm motility. In the osmotic resistance test, 3% glycerol as a freezing agent provided better protection to the spermatic membrane, differing from the

 

other treatments except for 3% DMSO and 1% glycerol. A higher percentage of living cells was observed in the 5% and 7% glycerol concentration, differing from the other concentrations. The highest percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes was observed when the freezing diluent containing 3% glycerol (73.8±11.9) was used. The results of this study suggested that glycerol is still the best cryoprotective option to be used in cryopreservation processes of swine sperm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. ALKMIN, D.V.; PARRILLA, I.; TARANTINI, T.; OLMO, D.; VAZQUEZ, J.M.; MARTINEZ, E.A.; ROCA, J. Seminal plasma affects sperm sex sorting in boars. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, v.28, p.556–564, 2016.
  2. ALMLID, T.; JOHNSON, L.A. Effects of glycerol concentration, equilibration time and temperature of glycerol 172 addition on post-thaw viability of boar spermatozoa frozen in straws. Journal of Animal Science, v.66, p.2899-2905, 1988.
  3. ANDRADE, A.F.C.; PEDROSA, A.C.; PASSARELLI, M.S.; MARTINS, S.M.M.K.
  4. Protocolos e possibilidades de criopreservação de sêmen suíno. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal, v.43, n.2, p.89-96, 2019.
  5. ATHURUPANA, R.; FUNAHASHI, H. Milk supplements in a glycerol free trehalose freezing extender enhanced cryosurvival of boar spermatozoa. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. v.5, n.1, p.58-62, 2016.
  6. BALL, B.A.; VO, A. Osmotic tolerance of equine spermatozoa and the effects of soluble cryoprotectans on equine sperm motility, viability and mitochondrial membrane potential. Journal of Andrology, v.22, p.1061-1069, 2001.
  7. BARIL, G.; CHEMINEAU, Y.; COGNIE, Y.; GUÉRIN, Y.; LEBOEUF, B.; ORGEUR, P.;
  8. VALLET, J.C. Manuel de formation pour l’insémination artificielle chez les ovins et les caprins. 3a ed., Nouzilly: INRA, 216., 1993. 137p.
  9. BARROS, T.B.; TONIOLLI, L.S.; GUIMARÃES, D.B.; FREITAS, E.N.; NUNES, T.G.P.; TONIOLLI, R. Curvas de resfriamento do sêmen do varrão diluído em ACP®103 adicionado de gema de ovo em concentração fixa. Ciência Animal Brasileira, v.17, n.4, p.540-549, 2016.
  10. BERGERON, A.; MANJUNATH, P. New insights towards understanding the mechanisms of sperm protection by egg yolk and milk. Molecular Reproductive Development, v.3, p.1338-1344, 2006.
  11. BIANCHI, I.; CALDERAM, K.; MADEIRA, E.M.; MASCHIO, E.F.; CORRÊA, E.K.; JUNIOR, T.L.; DESCHAMMPS, J.C.; CORRÊA, M.N. Crioprotetores intra e extra- celulares utilizados no congelamento do sêmen suíno. Suinocultura Industrial, v.09, p.32- 36, 2006.
  12. BORTOLOZZO, F.P.; WENTZ, I.; BENNEMANN, P.E.; BERNARDI, M.L.;
  13. WOLLMANN, E.B.; FERREIRA. F.M.; NETO, G.B. Suinocultura em ação: Inseminação artificial na suinocultura tecnificada. 1ª ed., Porto Alegre: Brasil, 2005. 185p.
  14. CARDOSO, R.C.S.; SILVA, A.R.; UCHOA, D.C.; SILVA, L.D.M. Congelação do sêmen canino com um diluidor a base de água de coco acrescido de gema de ovo e glicerol. Ciência Animal, v.10, p.29-36, 2000.
  15. CORRÊA, M.N.; MEINCKE, W.; LUCIA, J.R.T.; DESCHAMPS, J.C. Inseminação artificial em suínos. 1ª ed., Copyright. Pelotas, Brasil, 2001. 194p.
  16. DAS, A.K.; AHMED, N.; LALRINTLUANGA, K.; AHMED, F.A.; ALI, M.A.; SUBUDHI, P.K.; DEURI, D.; KURMI, D.J. Effect of Different Glycerol Levels on Quality of Frozen Semen of Mizo Local Boar. Journal of Animal Research, v.6, n.5, p.859-862, 2016.
  17. DEMEESTERE, I.; SIMON, P.; BUXANT, F.; ROBIN, V.; FERNADEZ, S.A.; CENTNER,
  18. J.; DELBAERE, A.; ENGLERT, Y. Ovarian function and spontaneous pregnancy after combined heterotopic and orthotopic cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation in a patient previously treated with bone marrow transplantation: Case Report. Human Reproduction, v.21, p.2010-2014, 2006.
  19. DERIVAUX, J. Reprodução dos Animais Domésticos. Zaragoza: Editora Acribia, 1980. 446p.
  20. FISER, P.S. Interaction of cooling velocity, warming velocity and glycerol concentration on the survival of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Supplement. v.1, p.1123-137, 1991.
  21. GARCIA-OLIVARES, A.; GARZON-PEREZ, C.; GUTIERREZ-PEREZ, O.; MEDRANO,
  22. A. Effect of cooling to different sub-zero temperatures on boar sperm cryosurvival. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction. v.5, n.1, p.63-66, 2016.
  23. GAYLOR CHEMICAL COMPANY (GCC). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) health and safety information. Slidell Bulletin, n.106, 2007. 16p.
  24. GRAHAM, J. K.; MOCÉ, E. Fertility evaluation of frozen/thawed semen. Theriogenology. v.64, p.492-504, 2005.
  25. HANCOCK, J.L.; HOVELL, G.J.R. The collection of boar semen. Veterinary Record, v.71, p.664-665, 1959.
  26. KAROW, A.M. For mammalian embryologists. Georgia, USA. Cryobiology, v.70, p.1-37, 2001.
  27. KAWANO, N.; SHIMADA, M.; TERRADA, T. Motility and penetration competence of frozen thawed miniature pig spermatozoa are substantially altered by exposure to seminal plasma before freezing. Theriogenology, v.61, p.351-364, 2004.
  28. KIM, S.; LEE, Y.J.; JI, D.B.; KIM, Y.J. Evaluation of Different Cryoprotectants (CPAs) in Boar Semen Cryopreservation. Theriogenology, v.73, p.961-963, 2011.
  29. KUMAR, S.; JHAMB, D.; MAURYA, S.N. Post vitrification survival of 2-cell stage IVP buffalo embryos: effect of concentration. Indian Journal of Animal Science, v.80, p.99-103, 2010.
  30. LOPES, C.A.P.; ALVES, A.M.C.V.; JEWGENOW, K.; BÁO, S.N.; FIGUEIREDO, J.R.
  31. Cryopreservation of canine ovarian cortex using DMSO or 1,3-propanediol. Theriogenology, v.86, n.5, p.1165-1174, 2016.
  32. LOVELOCK, J.E.; BISHOP, M.W.H. Preservation of freezing damage to living cells by dimethyl sulfhoxide. Nature, v.183, p.1394-1395, 1959.
  33. MADEIRA, E.M.; BIANCHI, I.; VIEIRA, M.B.; SCHNEIDER, A.; SEVERO, N.C.; PFEIFER, L.F.M.; CORRÊA, M.N. Avaliação de diferentes crioprotetores intra e extracelulares na criopreservação de sêmen de touros. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Belo Horizonte, v.65, n.2, p.415-420, 2013.
  34. MANJUNATH, P. New insights into the understanding of the mechanism of sperm protection by extender components. Animal Reproduction, v.09, p.809-815, 2012.
  35. MAHMOUND, K.G.H.M.; SHOLKAMY, T.H.; AHMED, Y.F.; SEIDEL, G.E.; NAWITO,
  36. M.F. Effect of different combination of cryoprotectantes on in vitro maturation of immature buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes vitrified by straw and open-pulled straw methods. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, v.45, p.565-571, 2010.
  37. MARTIN RILLO, S.; MARTINEZ, E.; GARCIA ANTIGA, C.; De ALBA, C. Boar semen
  38. evaluation in practise. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, v.31, p.519-526, 1996.
  39. MEDEIROS, A.A.; ARAÚJO, A.A.; MOURA, A.A.A.; CAVALCANTE, J.M.M.; FIGUEIRÊDO; RODRIGUES, L.F.S. Utilização do azul de bromofenol conservado a 4 oC e 29 oC, como método de coloração vital para a avaliação do espermatozoide ovino. Revista Ciência Agrária, v.46, p.287-297, 2006.
  40. MORAES, C.N.; NEVES, J.P.; GONÇALVES, P.B.D.; OLIVEIRA, J.F.C.;
  41. SCHWEITZER, C.M. Criopreservação do sêmen ovino em pellets com etileno glicol. Ciência Rural, v.28, n.2, p.287-292, 1998.
  42. PAQUIGNON, M.; MERGOUNIS, D.; COUROT, M.; DU MESNIL DU BUISSON, F. Technologie de la congélation de la semence de verrat: étude in vitro. Journées de Recherche Porcine en France, v.6, p.71-76, 1974. PARKS, J.E.; GRAHAM, J.K. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology, v.38, p.209-222, 1992.
  43. PENA, J.F.; JOHANNSISSON, A.; WALLGREN, M.; RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, H. Assessment of fresh and frozen-thawed boar semen using an Annexin-V assay: a new method of evaluating sperm membrane integrity. Theriogenology, v.60, n.4, p.677-689, 2003.
  44. PURDY, P.H. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Ruminant Research, v.63, p.215-225, 2006.
  45. REVELL, S.G.; MRODE, R.A. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Animal Reproduction Science, v.36, p.77-86, 1994.
  46. SAS Statistical Analysis System. v.6.03 Cary: SAS Institute, 1988. 1028p.
  47. SHAH, S.A.H.; ANDRABI, S.M.H.; AHMED, H.; QURESHI, I.Z. Cryoprotection synergism between glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide improves the mitochondrial transmembrane potential, plasmalemma, acrosomal and DNA integrities, and in vivo fertility of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) spermatozoa. Cytotechnology, v.68, p.2335-2344, 2016.
  48. SILVA, A.R.; GUERRA, M.M.P. Efeitos da criopreservação sobre as células espermáticas e alternativas para a redução das crioinjúrias. Revista Brasileira de Reprodução Animal, v.35, n.4, p.370-384, 2011.
  49. SILVA, C.G.; CUNHA, E.R.; BLUME, G.R.; MALAQUIAS, J.V.; BÁO, S.N.; MARTINS,
  50. C.F. Cryopreservation of boar sperm comparing different cryoprotectants associated in media based on powdered coconut water, lactose and trehalose. Cryobiology, v.70, n.2, p.90- 94, 2015.
  51. SLAVIK, T. Effect of glycerol on the penetrating ability of fresh ram spermatozoa with zone-free hamster eggs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, v.79, p.99-103, 1987.
  52. SMITAL, J. Effects influencing boar semen. Animal Reproduction Science, v.110, p.335– 346, 2009.
  53. SOJKA, J.E.; BRISSON-KIMMICK, S.V.; CARLSON, G.P.; COPPOC, G.L. Dimithyl
  54. sulfoxide update – New applications and dosing methods. Proceedings of the annual convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, v.36, p.683-690, 1990.
  55. SOLOCINSKI, J.; OSGOOD, Q.; WANG, M.; CONNOLLY, A.; MENZE, M.A.; CHAKRABORTY, N. Effect of trehalose as an additive to dimethyl sulfoxide solutions on ice formation, cellular viability, and metabolism. Cryobiology, v.75, p.134–143, 2017.
  56. SQUIRES, E.L.; PICKETT, B.W.; VANDERWALL, D.K.; Mc CUE, P.M.; BRUEMMER, J. Cooled and frozen stallion semen. Fort Collins: Colorado State University. Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Bulletin, n.9, 1999. 80p.
  57. STONE, R.W. Clinical uptates on the use of dimethyl sulfoxide. Canine Practice, v.18, p.16- 19, 1993.
  58. TAN, X.; SONG, E.; LIU, X.; YOU, W.; WAN, F. Factors affecting the survival, fertilization, and embryonic development of mouse oocytes after vitrification using glass capillaries. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biolog, v.45, p.420-429, 2009.
  59. TONIOLLI, R. Pouvoir fecondant des spermatozoïdes de verrat: amèlioration des conditions de conservation. 1996. 91p. (These de Doctorat.) - Université François Rabelais de Tours, France, 1996. Resumo disponível em http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=182303. Acesso em: 01/2012.
  60. TONIOLLI, R.; CANTANHÊDE, L.F. Aspectos gerais da criopreservação de sêmen suíno. Ciência Animal, v.29, n.1, p.45-62, 2019.
  61. TONIOLLI, R.; TONIOLLO, G.H.; FRANCESCHINI, P.H.; MORATO, F.M.A.C. Uso da água de côco em pó no processo de congelação do sêmen suíno: I. Controle durante o abaixamento da temperatura entre 30 e 15 oC. Ciência Animal, v.24, n.2, p.60-72, 2014. TONIOLLI, R.; TONIOLLO, G.H.; FRANCESCHINI, P.H.; MORATO, F.M.A.C. Uso do diluente BTS no processo de congelação do sêmen suíno: II. Modificações na técnica. Ciência Animal, v.25, n.4, p.44-59, 2015.
  62. VARELA Jr, A.S.; CORCINI, C.D.; STREIT JUNIOR, D.P.; RIZZOTO, G.; JARDIM, R.D.; LUCIA JUNIOR, T.; FIGUEIREDO, M.R.C. Efeito crioprotetor de diferentes concentrações do dimetilsulfóxido no congelamento de sêmen de Tambaqui Colossoma macropomum. Atlântica, v.34, n.2, p. 119-135, 2012.
  63. WATSON, P.F. Cooling of spermatozoa and fertilizing capacity. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, v.31, p.135-140, 1996.
  64. WATSON, P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Animal Reproduction Science, v.60-61, p.481-492, 2007.
  65. YANG, C.H.; WU, T.W.; CHENG, F.P.; WANG, J.H.; WU, J.T. Effects of different cryoprotectants and freezing methods on post-thaw boar semen quality. Reproductive Biology, v.16, n.1, p.41-46, 2016.
  66. YESTE, M. Sperm cryopreservation update: Cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology, v.85, n.1, p.47–64, 2016.
  67. YI, Y.J.; CHEON, Y.M.; PARK, C.S. Effect of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and glycerol concentration and equilibration time on acrosome morphology and motility of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Animal Reproduction Science, v.68, p.29-45, 2001.