A discussion on aversive control in dogs

Authors

  • Diogo Cesar Gomes da SILVA Laboratório Cognitivo Comportamental de Pesquisa e Intervenção (UNIDERP)
  • Fernanda Corrêa Gonçalves MORAES Laboratório Cognitivo Comportamental de Pesquisa e Intervenção (UNIDERP)
  • Patricia Oliveira CHAVES Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Local (UNIDERP)
  • Emmanuelle Lima MORAES Educadora Canina
  • José SABINO Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Local (UNIDERP)

Keywords:

Behaviorism, Ethology, Punishment, Reinforcment

Abstract

Faced with a growing concern with the understanding of canine ethology and processes in education and training, an emerging demand reflects people's desire for improvements in the quality of interspecific social interactions. Scientific fields such as Ethology and Behavioral Psychology have gained prominence in the orientation and construction of knowledge, as well as in intervention methods, aiming for social welfare and quality in multispecies families. Among the scientific currents that give basis to this scenario, in particular, the Behaviorist approach is predominant in the current scenario. Elementary concepts of Skinner's theory and Operant Behavior such as Reinforcement and Aversive Control are constantly discussed and applied in canine education processes and clinical behavioral contexts. However, theoretical and methodological disagreements are increasingly visible, polarizing opinions and practices. In the light of the above, this discussion turns to the critics of Skinner's theory in terms of Aversive Control in the practices involving education and behavioral clinic of dogs.

References

ANDICS, A.; GÁCSI, M.; FARAGÓ, T.; KIS, A Voice-Sensitive Regions in the Dog and Human Brain Are Revealed by Comparative fMRI. Current Biology, v.24, p.1-5, 2014.

BARON, A.; GALIZIO, M. Positive and negative reinforcement: Should the distinction be preserved? The Behavior Analyst, v.28, p.85-98, 2005.

BEAVER, B.V. Comportamento Canino: Um guia para veterinários. 1ª ed., São Paulo: Roca, 2000. 432p.

BRADSHAW, J. Cão senso: Como a nova ciência do comportamento canino pode fazer de você um verdadeiro amigo do seu cachorro. Ed. Record. 2012. 405p.

BROOM, D.M.; JOHNSON, K.G. Stress and animal welfare. 1ª ed,, Londres, Lower Academic, 1993. 228p.

CATANIA, A.C. Aprendizagem: Comportamento, linguagem e cognição. 4a ed., Porto Alegre, Artmed. p.79-235, 1999.

DONAHOE, J.W.; PALMER, D.C. Learning and Complex Behavior. 1a ed., Boston, London: Allyn and Bacon, 1994. 405p.

HINELINE, P.N. Aversive control: A separate domain? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, v.42, p.495-509, 2005. (Original 1984)

HOLTH, P. Two definitions of punishment. The Behavior Analyst Today, v.6, p.43-47, 2005.

HORNER, R. Ideology, technology, and typical community setting: Use of severe aversive stimuli. American Journal on Mental Retardation, v.95, p.166-168, 1990.

HUNZIKER, M.H.L. Afinal, o que é controle aversivo? Acta comportamentalia, vol. 19, p. 9-19, 2011.

LERMAN, D.C.; VORNDRAN, C. On the status of knowledge for using punishment: Implications for treating behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, v.35, p.431-464, 2002.

MAYER, P.C.M.; GONGORA, M.A.N. Duas Formulações Comportamentais de Punição: Definição, Explicação e Algumas Implicações. Acta comport, v.19, n.4, p.47-53, 2011.

MICHAEL, J. Positive and negative reinforcement: A distinction that is no longer necessary; or a better way to talk about bad things. Behaviorism, v.3, p.33-44, 1975.

MILLS, D.S. What’s in a word? A review of the attributes of a command affecting the performance of pet dogs. Anthrozöos, v.18, p.208–221, 2005.

MIKLÓSI, A.; KUBINYI, E.; TÓPAL, J.; GÁCSI, M.; VIRÁNYI, Z.; CSÁNYI, V. A simple reason for a big difference: Wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Current Biology, v.13, p.763-776, 2003.

MORSE, W.H.; KELLEHER, R.T. Schedules as a fundamental determinants of behavior. In Schoenfeld, W.N. (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, p.139-148, 1977.

NEWSOM, C.; FAVELL, J.E.; RINCOVER, A. The side effects of punishment. In J. Apsche & S. Axelrod (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York: Academic Press, p.285-316 1983.

NTINAS, K.M. Behavior modification and the principle of normalization: Clash or synthesis? Behavioral Interventions, v.22, p.165–177, 2007.

SANTOS, E.L.N.; LEITE, F.L. A distinção entre reforçamentos positivo e negativo em livros de ensino de análise do comportamento. Revista Perspectivas, v.4., n.1, p.9-18, 2013.

SIDMAN, M. Coerção e suas implicações. 1ª ed., Campinas, SP. Ed. Livro Pleno, 2003. 302p. (Original 1989)

SPRADLIN, J.E. Punishment: A primary process? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, v.35, p.475-477, 2002.

SKINNER, B.F. Ciência e comportamento humano. 1a ed., São Paulo: Martins Fontes. 2007. 489p.

TOPÁL, J.; TOPÁL, J.; ANTAL, D.; MIKÓSI, Á.; MIKLÓSI, A. Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test. Journal Comparative Psychology, v.112, n.3, pp.219–229, 1998.

WEISS, B.; LATIES, V.G. Behavioral Thermoregulation. Science, v.133, p.1338-1344 1961.

Published

2022-11-19

How to Cite

SILVA, D. C. G. da .; MORAES, F. C. G. .; CHAVES, P. . O. .; MORAES, E. L. .; SABINO, J. . A discussion on aversive control in dogs. Ciência Animal, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 2, p. 109–122, 2022. Disponível em: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/cienciaanimal/article/view/9609. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.