The hypothetical method in Platonic thought

Authors

  • Francisco Gabriel Marques de Almeida Caroba Universidade Estadual do Ceará - UECE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52521/occursus.v9i1.12360

Keywords:

Plato. Epistemology. Science. Method. Hypothesis

Abstract

This paper aims to provide the reader with a general outline of the hypothetical method in Plato, more specifically in the works in which the philosopher discusses this method in greater detail and depth. Not only that, but it also applies the hypothetical method in Plato: the Ménon, the Fédon and, in particular, the Republic. We say "in particular" because the treatment of this research methodology differs from the other two dialogues. On the one hand, we have the hypothetical method in its own right, as we see in all three dialogues. On the other hand, we have a question about what the function of the hypothetical method is for philosophical research and what it means for Philosophy as a Science, where we see this question being further developed in the Republic, which is where our exposition will culminate. In this sense, this essay aims to offer an approach to the hypothetical argument so that we can see the importance of this method for Plato, by treating it in its advantages and logical and epistemological limits that are intrinsic to them, as well as making us see the direct dialog that the Athenian philosopher had with "mathematics".

Author Biography

Francisco Gabriel Marques de Almeida Caroba, Universidade Estadual do Ceará - UECE

Mestrando em Filosofia pela Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE). Tem experiência na área de Filosofia Antiga, com ênfase em Platão, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: Epistemologia, Filosofia das Ciências, Metafísica e Ética.

References

ADAM, J· The Republic of Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.

ANNAS, J. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.

ANNAS, J. ‘‘On The Intermediates’’. In: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 57, pgs. 146-166, 1975.

BOSTOCK, D. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

CONFORD. F. M. The Republic of Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941.

DORTER. K. ‘‘The Divided Line and The Structure of Plato’s Republic’’. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1-20, Jan, 2004.

FINE, G. Introduction. In: FINE, G. Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, ‘‘Introduction’’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

FINE, G. Knowledge and Belief in Republic V-VII. In: FINE, G. Plato on Knowledge and Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.

GALLOP, D. Plato Phaedo. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1975.

JAEGER. W. Paidéia: a formação do homem grego. 3. ed. Tradução de Artur M. Parreira. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1994.

PLATÃO. Fédon. 2. ed. Tradução de José Cavalcante de Souza. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1983. (Col. Os pensadores).

PLATÃO. Mênon. Trad. de Maura Iglésias. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. PUC Rio; Loyola, 2001.

PLATÃO. Platonis opera. Ed. J. Burnet. Et. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1900 – 1909.

PLATÃO. República. 9. ed Tradução de Maria Helena da Rocha Pereira. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.

KAHN, Charles H. Plato And The Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use Of A Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996.

KAHN, Charles H. The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2003.

ROBINSON, R. Plato's Earlier Dialectic. New York: Cornell University Press, 1941.

ROWETT, C. Knowledge And Truth in Plato: Stepping Past The Shadow of Socrates. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press: 2018.

SCOTT, D. Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015

SCOTT, D. Plato’s Meno. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

VLASTOS, G. Reasons and Causes. In: VLASTOS, G. Platonic Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.

Published

2024-09-06

How to Cite

Caroba, F. G. M. de A. (2024). The hypothetical method in Platonic thought. Occursus - Revista De Filosofia, 9(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.52521/occursus.v9i1.12360